80°

Preview | Stellar Blade 'Devil May Sci-Fi' (PS5) - Quest Daily

Quest Daily went hands-on with the Stellar Blade demo ahead of March 30th: 'It's one of my most anticipated games of the year'.

Read Full Story >>
questdaily.com.au
Nyxus31d ago

Another DMC style game sounds good. Although it's time for a new game in that series as well I'd say.

jznrpg31d ago

I didn’t care for 5 at all.

ChronoJoe31d ago

It doesn't look like it plays much like DMC at all. Seems a lot slower, more like something like Nioh, really. I guess they just needed to fit the pun into the title.

60°

Stellar Blade Almost Cracks The Soulsborne Difficulty Code

Stellar Blade's balance of challenge is perfect, but it keeps tripping itself up.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
CrimsonWing6926m ago(Edited 26m ago)

There’s no difficulty code to crack.

Dark Souls is the game it is and difficulty it wants to be. Stellar is the game it is and the difficulty it wants to be with options.

It’s like saying Devil May Cry cracked the Ninja Gaiden difficulty code.

340°

PlayStation Will Refund Stellar Blade Digital Copies Over Claim Of False Advertisement

PlayStation will refund digital copies of Shift Up's latest action adventure game, Stellar Blade, over the claim of false advertisement.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CrimsonWing695h ago(Edited 5h ago)

You know what’s funny? I bet you if a game like GTA 6 that said it was going to be uncensored then went ahead and censored content and people wanted refunds, you wouldn’t be speechless.

What I don’t get is how is this difficult to see how this has become sending a message to the industry? People want this to stop no matter how small you think it is or dumb, they just want there to be no censorship. Had Shift Up just up and came out with the censored outfits and toned down blood effects from the beginning and never showed off the uncensored stuff this wouldn’t have been an issue. It’s the principle behind the changes that irked many.

How do you propose people go about trying to let Sony know to knock off this censorship? And if this was the outfit always intended and not censorship, then why won’t Shift Up just include the outfit as it was before? Case would’ve been closed and everyone but the SJW crowd would be happy.

staticall1h ago

@CrimsonWing69
Freaking A, man. I can't fathom why it's so hard to understand for some people. It's duffel bag from Fallout 69 all over again, they advertise one thing and you're getting the other. And it doesn't matter how small the change is. And those changes are never made in customers favor, quite the opposite. This is why we can't have nice things. And some people are defending this, pfffft.

And before people claim it's not censorship or it was unfinished model or whatever - every change was "cover this up", "tone down that". This is telling. And there's a really easy change to satisfy both - make both old and censored versions as separate costumes, problem solved. But nope, why can't they do that? Or add a switch "How much blood you want on Eve body during gory scenes?" with options "Like before", "Toned down" and "No blood". Then developers keep their promise of no censorship, everyone is happy. But, again, no.

itsmebryan1h ago

Some guys can really be weird. They will get a refund on a game because they can't have a skimpy outfit on thei character in a game.?

The game must not be very good if the outfit is the deal breaker for the game. And before tou get on your high horse about freedom. Things change for many reasons in the final product.

Smh

Solitariussaint7h ago

Good. Now these guys and gals can buy the physical version like they should have done to begin with and not download the patch.... Or not.

Either way it's a win-win because these players get their refund and Sony remembers this in the future so it won't happen again even though the game is uncensored without the patch.

Bring on Stellar Blade 2!

Extermin8or3_7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

This is insane people. The explanation that it was the unfinished model of that costume and they updated to correct that is plausible and that it makes no sense to censor this outfit and not all the more revealing ones. The patches were even issued before the game launched.

jambola6h ago

Was there any outfit changes that just changes but didn't cover more?

CrimsonWing694h ago

So if people want it back, how hard is it to change the mesh and include the original variants?

I don’t mean to offend by saying this, but I feel you’re one of those people who could watch a speech from the government and be like, “Well they said they explained they weren’t involved so that it’s true and that’s that!”

Keep in mind it wasn’t just several outfits that have been covered up like we’ve seen in many games. Do you really think the creators of Nikke (which has also been censored in the exact same ways) would really want to cover up hips and cleavage?

Not only that but the blood effect of covering her in red and letting the rain wash it off was censored. What’s the reasoning behind that? Because it was intended?

Let’s look at things Sony has censored:

https://screenrant.com/mart...

(This is only censored on Sony’s platform and uncensored on the others)

Or who could forget this one:

https://www.vg247.com/devil...

(That must be Capcom’s intended vision though and only for the Western PS4 release, right?)

I’m going to challenge you with this question, if it isn’t a big deal and Shift Up sees a strong demand for the unaltered versions of the costumes that’s leading to the loss of sales, then WHY not bring them back in and tell everyone not to sweat about it? It’s not hard, these are mesh changes and modders can tell you how quick it would be to change it back.

There was no “unfinished” design. That was in the base game from the moment the game went GOLD. Sony is maybe the worst of the 3 when it comes to censorship as presented in the links that are specific to only Sony’s platform.

People are tired of this and they’re making a statement with their wallets. Isn’t that what I see in these damn comment sections about GaaS and pre-ordering games that are busted on release? Vote with your wallets?

Huey_My_D_Long0m ago

Bruh it's too late for these people.

LoveSpuds7h ago

Honestly, you have to be some kind of loon to be that bothered, especially when there are far more revealing costumes in the game anyway, I guess folk just love a conspiracy theory these days.

To extremists on both end of this decade, buy the game and play it, it's a fucking rad action game!

Hugodastrevas2h ago

Nice gaslighting, people have the right to ask for a refund if they were sold one product and got another. It's not up to you or Sony to decide what others can enjoy.

Eonjay1h ago

I disagree. You got people making their decisions based on what they read on Twitter and watch on YouTube. If they can tell people what to think. Why not him, or Sony, or anyone else for that matter.

Crows902h ago

Conspiracy theories...they said the same about mercury being bad for you until....you know...they couldn't pretend otherwise anymore and removed it from all vaccines. I know that's not related to games but throwing around that word is

THE prime way mainstream has used to discredit truth.

StoneTitan2h ago

Its censorship dude. If you are for it just say it. I am against it but I do think the adjusted costumes look better.

itsmebryan1h ago

@love
I totally agree with you. I had to read the whole article to make sure I wasn't missing something. All this for a skimpy outfit.
Call it censorship or not, they are complaining about something that doesn't affect gameplay. I don't buy or play games just to ogle my character. Weird.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
Simundo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Can't say fairer than returning the money to those who are upset.

If punters do get refunds though I hope they continue to support Shift Up and buy it physical and unpatched and show their annoyance at Sony in other ways. I have bought mine with PSN credit and have a digital PS5 so won't be refunding as I want Shift Up to get my money still.

Although I'd rather the console makers left the devs well alone on decisions like this that's not realistic and they will have the final say. The downside of third party exclusivity and consolidation I guess. To few companies having the final word in what's released.

The changes are minor though and there's still so much T'n'A in the game I'd still say the game is a victory for those who support EVE's image over those that feel it's unrealistic, sexist or an embarrassment to gaming.

If the patched version had gone out for review and nobody was none the wiser about the changes then the game would still be praised by the pro EVE camp for it's depiction of a sexy and beautiful women. So I would say buying the patched version is still a victory on that front of the argument.

Crows902h ago

I get what you're saying but that would be a fake victory...something doesn't stop being bad if no one knows about it.

Simundo1h ago

I think you always have to be wary of censorship for the wrong reasons like pandering to ratings boards from countries with draconian views, interfering with the devs vision or appeasing an angry mob who should stay offended.

But I think people see the SB changes in the view of some larger fight against wokeism, cancel culture or the tip of some evil censorship iceberg etc... when it really doesn't belong there.

When you look at the patched version that's released it's still full of T'n'A with outfits left "uncensored" that reveal more then the changed one(s). Sony has still put out a game that's a sexist, unrealistic teenagers wet dream if you want to view that way. The game will still upset all the same people as it did before. Sony have still put out a "controversial" game.

When it comes to extremes of the argument the pro EVE people have got a game much closer to their liking than those who think she's an embarrassment to gaming and sexist. Buying the patched version is still a victory against those who say a depiction of a woman like EVE has no place in gaming.

If you don't want to buy it or want a refund because you feel you've been sold a lie by the minor changes then I would say that the "censorship" is mild in the extreme and doesn't represent some wider issue of worrisome censorship.

I'd just say though if your do feel that way still support the game and Shift Up and find another way to let Sony know you're not happy.

Show all comments (29)
160°

After All That, Stellar Blade's Eve Is Nothing Like We Expected

Stellar Blade fans wanted Eve to stick it to the man, but she feels too tame and most reactions say she should have gone further.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
H921h ago

"Stellar Blade fans wanted Eve to stick it to the man"

I haven't seen a single fan say that, honestly not even one, am I missing something

Crows9011h ago

You're not. Mainstream loves to be creepy. They love imposing stereotypes and pushing their own agenda into others.

LoveSpuds7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Don't call the gamer.com 'mainstream' Crow, you'll only encourage them🤣. The problem these days is there are no journalistic standards in video games media.

Even the mainstream sites such as IGN and Gamespot are too close to 'the industry' to really be of any use. But outside of the mainstream, anyone can run a website without the barest minimum of standards.

fr0sty8h ago

sounds more to me like they wanted the man to stick it to her...

romulus2321h ago(Edited 21h ago)

This whole article is a game "journalist" complaining becasue a video game character "isn't sexy enough". Is this really what it's come to?

MrBaskerville16h ago

The world is divided into two factions. Those who want 25% visibility of butt crack and those who fight for 26% visibility.

LoveSpuds7h ago

It's a war I am willing to fight....Where's my pitchfork!

15h ago
gold_drake10h ago

sigh.

i dont remember anyone ever wanting eve to "stick it to the man" watsoever. not sure what the author is talking about.

Show all comments (12)