1020°

New look for PS5 console this holiday season

Smaller PS5 design comes with 1TB storage for PS5 and PS5 Digital Edition; new model provides option to add an Ultra HD Blu-ray Disc Drive to PS5 Digital Edition.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
sparky77235d ago

Somehow they managed to make the disk version even uglier.

darthv72235d ago

The disc and digital are exactly the same now. Only difference is the disc one comes with the drive and cover while the digital you have to buy the drive w/cover for another $80 if you want to make your own Disc 5.
Disc 5: $500
Digital 5: $450
Optical drive: $80

Lightning77235d ago

They look nice. Even slicker than before. If anyone doesn't have a PS5 this holiday now's the time especially with Spider-Man 2 releasing very soon.

Vits235d ago

What is curious is that they also made the base Digital version more expensive than it was previously. Now it's $450 vs $400 of the original digital one. Given that the Digital PS5 definitely has the potential to generate the most amount of revenue in the long run - they being the sole supplier of games for it - it's a rather odd decision.

darthv72235d ago

@vits... I guess they felt that the price of the combo should be cheaper than buying the parts separately. if they stuck to the same price as now, the digital at $400 and the optical drive at $80 would have been $20 cheaper than the combo. only way to make the combo look more attractive is to raise the price of the digital.

The reason the originals had such a delta was because they both had their own board. So it cost more for the disc board than the digital board. The disc one has the firmware and controller onboard for the optical drive. The digital does not.

Now I understand that they simplified things and put the controller and firmware onto the external drive board. Which means they can churn out just one motherboard for both disc/digital units. It would be cool if this new external drive was also compatible with the existing digital units but we just have to wait for more info on that.

roadkillers235d ago

wtf, $50 more for a digital. Jesus Christ, it is 3 years old.

Vits235d ago

@darthv72

But that is kind of the point. For Sony, the combo should not be the priority, they get more money if you the user are only allowed to get your games by PSN. Therefore the Digital Slim should at the surface level be the better deal to entice users to buy it rather than the Disc version.

And what makes this even weirder is that they could very well had their cake and eaten it too. We have to remember that they are sunsetting the original model, so they were open to a bunch of different price strategies. Included but not limited to just offsetting the extra $50 to the Optical Drive itself.

The only reason that I can think of for them to go with this strategy is if the Digital version lost them too much money. But if that is the case, it's still super weird that they are doing that price increase with the Slim version that historically is cheaper to manufacturer and really the sole reason for Slim consoles to even exist in the first place.

DaCajun235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

You forgot to mention the $30 vertical stand that's not included anymore.

This kind of BS along with the ridiculous PS plus price increase is why I just built a new PC after 20 years. Been with PS since PS1 but I'm done with consoles.

Also since multiplayer games is all cross play now and we are playing with PC cheaters anyway. What's the benefit now. I used to love the closed system without the PC cheaters. All we had was laggers which was never as bad as it is now. Xbox is garbage and now Sony is going full stupid lately. Jim should have left long ago. I guess he's going to take PS down as he leaves.

JackBNimble234d ago

You guy's complaining about $50 must be American, because Sony raised the price everywhere else over a year ago.
The price of the digital edition, at least when I last checked, is $630cnd.

Must be nice to get a console for $450.

Cacabunga234d ago (Edited 234d ago )

I really like the idea of Modular design.. Same base PS5 with add on
it is not for me though I’d prefer a PS5 pro.. and some games taking advantage of it

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 234d ago
RaidenBlack235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

So this leak was correct all along :
https://n4g.com/news/256273...

and Tom Henderson leaked these even wayy before (September 2022) ...
https://twitter.com/_Tom_He...

Obscure_Observer235d ago

"Somehow they managed to make the disk version even uglier."

Yeah... but the digital version looks neat.

Looks like all those PS5 Pro rumors where nothing but steaming load of bullshit.

andy85235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

Those rumours were for next year not this year. That's 100% happening imo

235d ago
Lightning77235d ago

The rumor is 2024 for the Pro.

mkis007235d ago

It actually 100% confirms them. Not a shred of doubt anymore. Playstation portal, slim, disc drive add on , and ps5 pro were all outed by the same leak. Pro is for next year.

Sonic1881235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

"Looks like all those PS5 Pro rumors where nothing but steaming load of bullshit."

You're going to be disappointed then because that's 💯 happening especially from all the reliable sources I've seen

jeromeface235d ago

or a pro is still coming...

DarXyde235d ago

1. What's makes it "uglier"?
2. PS5 Pro is expected next year, not this year. Why would they show it off this year?

Obscure_Observer235d ago

@Sonic1881

"You're going to be disappointed then because that's 💯 happening especially from all the reliable sources I've seen"

You said you have your own "reliable sources" which have you informed on a second Playstation Showcase this year, and so far nothing!

Your "sources" means absolutely nothing to me.

@DarXyde

1. What's makes it "uglier"?

The Blu Ray drive is even more pronounced on this one, which makes looks deformed, weird and out of place in my eyes.

2. PS5 Pro is expected next year, not this year. Why would they show it off this year?

Why Why would they show it off next year? I mean, it´s not like the PS5 has any true nex gen games to show off for it´s base PS5. 2024 looks like a blank page without a single AAA first party next gen game to show gamers why a Pro version is even needed in the first place.

FinalFantasyFanatic235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

That could still happen, Sony given us both a slim line console and a pro console before.

234d ago
DarXyde234d ago

Obscure_Observer,

"The Blu Ray drive is even more pronounced on this one, which makes looks deformed, weird and out of place in my eyes."

That's the issue? That it's not more symmetrical? Ok. That's like me complaining that the newer Series X is called "X Box" but it's a bloody toilet paper roll (or Alexa —I reckon it listens in on you more than an Alexa though). It's such a non-issue for its appearance. The real issue from a design perspective is the fact that the stands are different.

"Why Why would they show it off next year? I mean, it´s not like the PS5 has any true nex gen games to show off for it´s base PS5."

Yeah, you're trolling. Funny thing is I wondered why we even need an Xbox One X for the same reasons.

PS5 games with 10.28TF look equal or better than games running on a 12TF platform, so save it. GT7 is cross gen and STILL looks better than FM8 in many instances. I will also add that PS5 has VR, which, when combined with Pro hardware, pushes the experience that much further. I wouldn't need Pro hardware, but there is clearly meaningful application for it.

"2024 looks like a blank page without a single AAA first party next gen game to show gamers why a Pro version is even needed in the first place."

Remind me, didn't Xbox literally just get their first "AAA" game for this generation THIS YEAR? The best part, I can't think of a single first party game they launched this year that wasn't originally intended for PlayStation too, but Microsoft using their corporate imperialist powers purchased them. All games we know also had PlayStation versions in the works (HFR is not known definitively, but realistically, we know).

I get the sense that you're worried about a 5 Pro being more powerful than the Series X knowing there's (allegedly) no new X models coming.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 234d ago
Aloymetal235d ago

Well, at least the PS5 including theses have a design, it's not like they just decided to build a black Lego block and call it a day. Plus they will sell like crazy these holidays;)

Andrew336235d ago

Didn't take long to bring xbox into this somehow.

Chevalier235d ago

Yeah a block lego and a cylindrical one appearing like a garbage 🗑

FinalFantasyFanatic235d ago

To be fair, there's only so many ways you can design a box.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 235d ago
darthv72235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

I expect a teardown on this like they did the original. Id like to know how they fixed the 825gb limitation in order to use 1tb now. Hopefully they didnt just remove the surface mount SSD and just go with the M.2 expansion instead. I know SSD are faster now and cheaper than their custom solution. They wouldnt give up on that... they put so much effort into it.

SoloGamer1235d ago

who cares how it looks.. as long as the games are dope....😏

Limitedtimestruggle235d ago

They really did made the disc version look worse, but who cares. It already looks shit..but it plays good games.

BillyCrystals235d ago

Ugly or not, the PS2 and PS5 are the coolest looking PlayStations to me.

Rgbsquad235d ago

I gotta a feeling a lot of people took this VERY personaly lol.

ravens52235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

Lol I wonder what people saying "50 extra for digital!" are going to feel when the new series X with no disc drive aka digital only comes out for $500 after 4 years lmfao.

Barlos234d ago

I dunno. I'm not a fan of the look of the OG PS5 but there's no denying it does look unique. I think this newer version, while still not very pretty, does at least look a bit slicker.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 234d ago
darthv72235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

I'll nab a digital one. I like that they upped the SSD size and have an add-on bluray. Looks like you no longer need the stand, which explains why its separate. I see a kick stand in one shot with the optical drive attached.
https://live.staticflickr.c...

IMissJimRyan235d ago

I'm so happy Sony was able to reduce production costs and increase retail price on hardware, subscriptions and software. Next fiscal year I'll shove the financial results in Xbox and Nintendo fanboys. They won't have a chance.

235d ago
IMissJimRyan235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

@TQQ

Exactly! And all that combined with the prices increasing is going to make results going through the roof! Imagine: hardware cheaper to make and more expensive to buy, subscriptions with an increase of 33% and software with US$10 more in the price. Wow! Sony assets will skyrocket! I'm so happy to be part of the team achieving those results. I've upgraded my Plus from essential to premium to give results a boost.

fr0sty235d ago

I guess the dust Sony kicks up when they fly by has a salty taste to it, based on some of these comments.

goldwyncq235d ago

How much are you getting paid by Sony to do this again?

235d ago
235d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 235d ago
Felix_Argyle_Catbro235d ago

This new digital one costs 50 bucks more than the old one. You should buy the old one while you still can.

darthv72235d ago

...but then I wont be able to add an optical drive later on when i want to.

Felix_Argyle_Catbro235d ago

Buy an old disc model for 400 bucks or less. Buying the new digital model for more and then an additional disc drive doesn't make any sense.

darthv72235d ago

Oh i know... I collect variants. It's my thing.

235d ago Replies(4)
343_Guilty_Spark235d ago

I wish the Series S had an attachable drive.

I’m impressed by the look of these. Well done Sony.

Tacoboto235d ago

$50 difference with it bundled, $80 standalone.

I was thinking it would be no cheaper than a $100 difference. I really like the look of it too - I'm impressed.

Xbox Series X All Digital is DOA if they don't release a USB C drive

Hofstaderman235d ago

I agree with you. MS would be stupid not change their digital only mid gen refresh after this.

dumahim235d ago

And soon the series X won't have one either.

Felix_Argyle_Catbro235d ago

They really couldn’t be assed to include a vertical stand in the box huh

AND they increased the price for digital? bro what

mkis007235d ago

With physical games being possible with this model, there is no guarantee it will make as much money on digital purchased like the previous digital did. They sold the ps5 for much lower than a disc drive would cost because they knew they made a lot more on digital purchases.

ModsDoBetter235d ago

They don't really have any competition yet and probably won't until Microsoft start offering new COD releases on GamePass.

(No matter what way people may try and spin it here, COD is one of, if not, consistently the biggest selling game ever year and most gamers aren't on sites like this, they're more casual: COD, Fifa, Madden and call it a day)

As a result they're becoming a little more anti-consumer because they don't really have anything to worry about.

What are you going to do? Complain so hard about the $50 hike and buy an xbox? Nah, consumers would just buy the PS.

purple101234d ago

its 1tb hard drive now, not 825gb

but shitty about the stand yeh.

neutralgamer1992235d ago

I don’t think so. These consoles barely have been tapped into so why update it. By updating specs it would most likely cost more when it’s just now that chip and supply shortages have been dealt with

Outside_ofthe_Box235d ago

I agree, but rumors of a Pro model were consistent despite no need for it.

Christopher235d ago

***I agree, but rumors of a Pro model were consistent despite no need for it. ***

About as consistent as the Switch Pro rumors over the last 3 years.

RaidenBlack235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

only "slim-ish" model for now
30% less volume and ~20% lighter
but Pro model is in-development, codenamed ‘Trinity’, and is targeting a November 2024 release date(as per tom henderson, who also leaked the above "slim" models in September last year) :

https://twitter.com/_Tom_He...
https://keytogaming.com/202...

MTRNYC235d ago

That's a significant reduction, almost certainly larger reduction than the PS4 Slim.

Especially when you compare that to the original PS5, which your comparison isn't against.

blackblades235d ago

Wait for next year, any way I was doubtful on every thing cause everything was just rumors. Still there were 2 rumors, that it exist but also that it might have been cancel but who knows. Going by recent offical announcements in leading to it being legit

goldwyncq235d ago

Next year. The guy who leaked the slim version last year said that a Pro will be out by Holiday 2024.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 235d ago
Show all comments (174)
160°

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Combat Director Wants Final Part To Offer Players "Even More Freedom"

The Final Fantasy VII Rebirth combat director has expressed that he wants the final part in the trilogy to offer players "even more freedom".

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gold_drake19h ago

i wonder if where gonna be able to jump

EternalTitan5m ago

Well its not an action game.
Even Elden Ring added jumping as an evolution of the combat system since Dark Souls did not feature jumping.
I want jumping as much as the next action game fan but this isnt that type of game.

-Foxtrot13h ago

I love the game so far but please don’t make the final part a mini game fest

Everytime I get to a new part in Rebirth it’s “mini game time”

Inverno6h ago

Hope ya don't mind me asking since it seems like you've played it, did it feel like a decent step up from the last game or was it more like the best from the last but more polished?

CS76h ago

It makes Remake feel like a demo.

9.5/10 imo. And I think the “mini games” did a great job of adding variety to the gameplay. Purely optional as well.

-Foxtrot5h ago

Here's my thoughts

I think it's a big step up from the first instalment, I'm enjoying it way more.

I thought keeping it just in Midgar was silly, it felt dragged out and it didn't have much variation in terms of the scenery.

However with Rebirth, as soon as you get out of Kalm you have a big world to explore and it's great to just wander round and explore.

Now that I'm half way in though, despite still liking what I'm playing, the gameplay loop is now starting to slow down on me. I've got to a new region and I'm like "Yaaay...need to go and find those towers again, oh look another special beast marker, is that a bird I see in the distance? Better follow it to another Mako Crystal"

It's like....you know how Peter Jackson was only supposed to have two Hobbit films then Warner Bros wanted a third film so he stretched the second film out as much as he could so he could keep stuff for the third film making a trilogy? Yeah it feels like that, so these mini games are a part of that overall gameplay loop to keep us going and stretch the game out overall so they have something for the third and final game.

I personally think you could have had the first instalment get you out of Midgar and through to Grasslands / Junon and the second game finishes things off.

Becuzisaid6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I had a weird cycle of love/hate for all the mini games as I played through. At first I really hated the seeming need to check all these boxes while exploring the grasslands. I didn't enjoy the Gilgamesh quest initially, and thought Queen's blood was fine but didn't want to commit to it. The side quests didn't really grab me either.

Then for some reason everything in Junon region changed my mind and I did pretty much everything. I liked most of the side quests, I actually liked playing fort condor (didn't care for it in the intergrade dlc). And my interest for completing these quests stayed pretty much through to Cosmo Canyon.

Then they added that horrible Lifestream memory/battle mini game and I started getting so burnt out of it all. I just wanted to do the story. I didn't do any side quests in neibleheim and beyond except for the summon. I abandoned Gilgamesh.

So what I'm saying is I would like the third part to go back to the focused progression from remake. Keep the mini games to the gold saucer. Start the game snowboarding if you want, but from there keep the story rolling.

-Foxtrot5h ago

That's funny you say that because I did everything in the Grasslands but once in Junon I started to slow down a little until Corel where by the end I was burnt out. I'm still currently going but I'm just doing what I can while things keep getting thrown at me.

I would have preferred half of these mini game side fillers / collectibles for some really beefy side quests that really adds onto the world of FFVII.

Inverno4h ago

Sounds like they hadn't really figured out what they wanted to do with Remake and this one is more of what they thought of doing which is probably why they're dragging it out to make a trilogy. Disappointed to hear it has towers cause man do i hate towers lol. It's been a while since I've played the first and it'll be a while longer to play the sequel, but it sounds like I'll enjoy it. 7 really impressed me especially after being disappointed with 15, felt like Square finally realized that FF was THEIR big franchise again.

Tacoboto3h ago

How many hours are you into it at this point?

My friend got like 20-30 in and pretty much quit because of its mini game era. He loved and basically binged through Gran Blue compared to Rebirth

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
MetroidFREAK216h ago

As long as it comes out on PS5 to have the entire series on one platform, do whatever you want

franwex5h ago

The combat is my favorite thing about Rebirth. Would be really cool if they can improve it even more.

Knightofelemia4h ago

I hope after FF7 Square will either give a new FF game the remake treatment. Or give some of their older titles a remake treatment like Chrono Trigger, Chrono Cross, even Xenogears.

Show all comments (15)
210°

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2's Scope Was Impacted by Xbox Series S Limitations

Wccf tech writes: "Kingdom Come Deliverance 2's scope was impacted by the Xbox Series S hardware limitations, as developers could only make a game that was 25% bigger than its predecessor."

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

This is the issue with things like this

Xbox Series X is apparently to MS the worlds most powerful console

However the Series S is obviously a limitation because it’s underpowered and developers have to go for parity.

So what’s the point of the world’s most powerful console if you are holding third party developers back? They aren’t going to push themselves if they have to think about the weakest console.

The issue wouldn’t be as bad if it was just Xbox but you are also affecting the PS version aswell

I think developers need to start just taking advantage of a console and if one of them can’t do X Y and Z then f*** them…why should the others suffer. What’s MS going to do? The bigger the franchise the least chance MS are going to tell them to f*** off. Baulders Gate 3 seemed to have stood their ground and suddenly their “strict” parity rule didn’t really matter. We suddenly got super optimisation efforts for the Series S that got things sorted.

anast9h ago

I agree, and the sad part is use normal folk saw it the second they announced their plans.

Abear215h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Agree 100% this is why I didn’t want the M$ Monopoly, now PS5 version will be held back too.

If PS5 Pro comes out and Series S is still a thing it’ll be interesting what differences and what devs choose to do. Really hoping Rockstar pushes the PS5 pro with GTA6 and we get the best version possible.

outsider16243h ago

Good ole S indeed. Everyone knew this all along. S was holding games back...Now where the hell is Orchard i want a word with him.

LucasRuinedChildhood13h ago

More info from the author of the article, I think: https://www.reddit.com/r/ki...

Quote:
"1) I was told this info from the producer of the game Martin Klíma.
2) He specifically said the game will have only one mode.
3) And this mode is 4K 30 on PS5/XSX and 1440p 30 on XSS.
4) He said that the game is already running north of the 30 FPS cap so the performance should be stable on launch, much better than KCD1.
5) The limitation was XSS because of the 10GB memory. He said that's why they wanted to make the game 25% larger.
6) Speculation on my part: the output resolution is probably upscaled and the reason why there won't be a 60 FPS mode is because it'll most likely be very CPU heavy, like Dragon's Dogma 2 for example."

Doesn't seem like they're adding a 40fps mode on PS5/Series X for launch even if they can handle it.

Sgt_Slaughter9h ago

I'd much rather have 1440p/60fps or even 45fps. Having just one, even with the Series S in mind, is disappointing.

franwex7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Remember when xbots were adamant that the series s won’t hold back the gen?

Microsoft just needs to let go of the mandatory parity. Who cares if your grandma doesn’t understand that a game cannot be played on the S. It’s not like it she can buy you a physical game for it anyway. Before buying the game put up a notice that it only works on series X. If you’re buying for a friend-allow for a refund.

Bam. Everyone is happy. Most series s owners are for casuals that want Game Pass anyway and most likely don’t purchase most games.

If the developers want it to run on S, let them figure it out.

Chocoburger1h ago

If it were Series X only then they'd only be selling to 25% of the Xbox Series userbase, and that's certainly not worth the time and effort into doing a port. Could just do PS5 & PC instead. No compromises needed.

Jin_Sakai7h ago

“During the event, the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 producer also revealed that on PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X, the game will run at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second“

Another “creative decision” right? 🤦‍♂️

IHateNate7h ago

Amateur hour. Very incapable developer.

Outside_ofthe_Box6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Since you're not an amateur and clearly know more than them, can you over there and help get the game running on the S without having to sacrifice their true vision. Us gamers would really appreciate you using your wisdom for good 🙏

IHateNate6h ago

Thousands of games run just fine on S.

But Kingdom Come is the game that can’t. Must be one hell of a game!

franwex5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Thousands of games run on PS4 and on Switch. If developers want them to run on those systems. Fine. Those two platforms still get new games. Sony isn’t making studios also make a ps4 pro version, or Nintendo a wiiu version. Microsoft technically is.

IHateNate4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

If games like Alan Wake 2, GTA6, COD, hellblade all run on S, no excuse for this 100x smaller and 100x worse looking game to be held back.

outsider16243h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"Thousands of games run just fine on S.

But Kingdom Come is the game that can’t. Must be one hell of a game!"

Kingdom come 2 runs just fine alright. Its the SCOPE that they want. They had to cut it because of the stupid S series. Hellblade2 ran just fine too..but im pretty confident if it was just the X in mind, the scope of the game would have been much bigger.

IHateNate2h ago

So their scope is greater than that of GTA6 and warzone? Wow. Crazy

Show all comments (21)
100°

Celebrate the Diablo Anniversary with March of the Goblins

Come celebrate the 1-year anniversary of Diablo IV and the 2-year anniversary of Diablo Immortal! There are heaps of rewards to mark these celebrations with a bounty of devilish goods across both games.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
anast14h ago

This game is about to get buried by Path 2.

LordoftheCritics13h ago

Still no global chat or group finder.

The emptiest MP game ever made.

OtterX13h ago

1 more month then I can celebrate 1 year since i stopped playing and uninstalled the game.

Walalon11h ago

We are on the same team brother!

Rynxie8h ago

I uninstalled d4 after they kept screwing over the sorc build and I beat the game. I also uninstalled immortal after reading the end. I actually went back to d2r here and there.