1090°

Microsoft Deal to Buy Activision Blizzard Is Officially Blocked by UK's CMA

Microsoft's $68.7B deal to buy Activision Blizzard has been locked by the UK's CMA on competition concerns for the growing cloud market.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
SullysCigar402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

Ruh roh... But I heard it was a dead cert? Oh well, Microsoft could just use that money to continue to support the xbox brand before it bleeds out entirely, so this might buy them a little time.

Now we know their hardware made 30% less revenue than this time last year, God knows they could do with some money in the coffers. This might also explain why Nintendo suddenly tried to distance themselves from this fiasco the other day.

*LaughingJimRyan.gif*

Eonjay402d ago Show
DarXyde402d ago

Honestly, I'm very surprised by this turn of events. I was very skeptical of the chances of success until recently and it seemed like a done deal.

Now, this. I hope the appeal fails and Kottick gets nailed to the damn wall.

I really do hope that Xbox gamers understand that if this deal fails with certainty (i.e., no remedies provided by Microsoft are adequate), they don't lose anything. It just means all of their games *might not* launch into game pass. ABK aren't skipping Xbox, don't worry. The real takeaway is that they won't skip PlayStation. If either of those things are deeply troubling to you, you're kind of awful. It pretty much translates into "I don't want ABK games on that other console" or "I don't want to pay for games". Possibly both.

darthv72402d ago

Well shit. They will appeal and make more concessions. MS is not letting this go.

shinoff2183402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

You know how many games and studios ms could make with 70 billion dollars. They've recently bought 5 decent studios, inxile, obsidian, etc and a big ass publishers with numerous ip s under them. That should've been plenty. Pump the fking games out now ms you have plenty.

Also see ya in September for starfield. Can't wait

Darth just seen your comment. I think your absolutely right.

S2Killinit401d ago

Im very happy with this decision. Its likely that the deal will still go through in a different and hopefully lesser shape but I hope they break this down as much as possible to prevent this sort of gobbling up of the industry. MS should pay dearly for pulling this crap. Still, I dont see this stopping MS, but a welcomed news nonetheless.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 401d ago
Flawlessmic402d ago

Wow thought this was a done deal tbh, as much as I thought the deal going through would've been bad gaming in the long run I was kinda looking forward to all those games coming to gp and not having to buy them.

I wonder if this will be enough to stop the deal though

Alexious402d ago

Reversing the CMA's ruling would be a miracle at this point. It almost never happens.

crazyCoconuts402d ago

Technically if MS pays a fair price to Activision to cover the lost direct sales, I have no doubt COD could still be put on GamePass. Should be about equal to the opportunity cost of them doing it if it were part of MS

DarXyde402d ago

Never say never.

I think some people are celebrating prematurely. Just to seal the deal, I would not discount Microsoft's willingness to accept any remedies provided by the CMA if it allows them to proceed even 80% as intended.

Hopefully, we can shut up about this (myself included). We clearly have no idea what we're talking about, so let's just take a wait and see approach. I think the Xbox gang was overly hopeful and everyone else just said there's no way... Then it was looking very likely and they took a victory lap. Now, we're starting to see the original skeptics being proven right, albeit for different-than-expected reasons.

We're clueless, mate. Just waiting to see now.

DarXyde402d ago

Crazycoconuts,

"Technically if MS pays a fair price to Activision to cover the lost direct sales, I have no doubt COD could still be put on GamePass. Should be about equal to the opportunity cost of them doing it if it were part of MS"

True, but I really doubt Microsoft is willing to put up that kind of money. I would also think that gives ABK perverse incentive to crank out more games, regardless of quality/reuse of assets. At that point, you're guaranteed revenue from Microsoft, so why go beyond minimal effort?

Rynxie402d ago

So, just because you want free games, you would let a clear monopoly go through? What a sad "I want everything free" generation we live in. Willing to screw others over for your own benefit, this also goes for politics.

dcbronco402d ago

Explain how Microsoft buying Activision hurts gaming?

Flawlessmic402d ago

@ rynxie

Read my post again, clearly said I was against it, if you check my previous comment history you will see that is also the case.

However as I mentioned I thought it was a done deal at this point so figured no point crying about it started to see the positives.

I buy plenty of games mate on my ps5 and switch probably a lot more than you, my series x however is my gamepass machine I bought it for that specific reason so don't lump me in with that group.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 402d ago
neutralgamer1992402d ago

CMA just blocked this deal from happening in my opinion. Unlike ftc which is so political and our broken judiciary CMA won’t lose during the appeal process

This is such a huge issue now because we all thought CMA were on board. I guess this story needed more plot twists

shinoff2183402d ago

Neutralgamer1992

I salute you for being one of the well i guess Neutralist people here. I say that as a Sony troll.

dcbronco402d ago

I don't believe this was an honest process. There's no way they can look at years of Sony having a larger marketshare and look at all of the exclusivity deals Sony paid for during that time while having that much of a lead and determine that anything is hurting Sony economically. Especially since Microsoft hasn't said CoD would be exclusive. If nothing else it would seem Sony is guilty of years of anticompetitive practices and should be punished. Which is what it sounds like congress is looking into. This might still come back to really bite Sony in the ass badly.

outsider1624402d ago

No shit man ! I did not expect that!

Bathyj402d ago

I might finally join Twitter today

generic-user-name402d ago

It's delicious already and the West Coast isn't even awake yet.

execution17402d ago

😅 they're getting called clowns by a few of the ms fanboys. Shame I'm blocked by some of them so I can't see all their meltdowns

neutralgamer1992402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

Bathyj

Haha good times

Honestly, don’t understand how some of these so-called gamers are behaving on social media. It’s like they have no personal life. They are on social media so often. I wonder when they actually play the games for the company they’re defending. And like I said earlier, unlike FTC, CMA cannot be defeated that easily in the judicial process. Even FTC will most likely block this so MS will have to appeal in both regions and will certainly lose one

dumahim402d ago

@neutralgamer1992

"Honestly, don’t understand how some of these so-called gamers are behaving on social media."

You can't? I'm sure there are already death threats flying around, as is the way for certain gamers when they don't get their way.

FinalFantasyFanatic401d ago

@neutralgamer1992,
Adults are just big kids, some of us more/less so than others, some of those people will probably be teenagers as well, or I theorize would want this deal moreso because they have less money.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 401d ago
Abracadabra402d ago

... and the soap opera will continue.

FlavorLav01402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

Who’d thunk it?….Sony gained a massive industry talent this year and former main studio of Xbox’s - Bungie for under the amount that Xbox and MS just lost on a failed attempt to buy gaming’s biggest IP and came up empty handed. You can’t write this stuff…. Phil’s gotta be on his way out, right?

SullysCigar401d ago

If this is indeed the end of this deal, it HAS to be the end of Phil. That's just how these things work. They will appeal the decision and who knows, maybe this time they'll cross the right palms with silver and keep their dream alive. If you were working for the CMA and the buck stopped with you, those Microsoft trillions would surely play on your mind somewhat... Let's just hope they remain true to their role and protect the industry rather than feathering their own nests going forwards.

Gamingsince1981402d ago

Meh I said the first day the news broke MS was trying to buy AKB not to get excited but they all said it was a done deal because it's just fine *insert just fine meme* , MS can't buy the world and its a good thing this failed, the only people that could be upset are the 2 companies involved because of all the money they are losing now and people that thought keeping previously multiplat games off other platforms was a good thing, the deal going through would only be bad.

1Victor402d ago

We all knew it was going to fail when Michael pacter predicted otherwise it doesn’t fail if he say it’s a game is pure genius and amazing expect a half done buggy 💩

notachance402d ago

Sony should do Playstation Showcase featuring in-depth gameplay preview for Starfield just for the lol

402d ago
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 401d ago
sparky77402d ago

Huge plot twist it was blocked even without the Playstation issues.

Sounds like they will appeal but at this rate they should just move on, since without this deal I don't see how Xbox can recover from it's sales decline.

AmUnRa402d ago

They can apeal but the decision of the CMA is almost always followed.

tay8701402d ago

Yep. Not to mention they will would be battling for about 3 yrs, only to take the L again. I don't like any of ABKs games, but I'm glad MS wasn't able to buy whomever they want without being checked. Been a VERY bad last couple of weeks for MS. Their entire gaming division looks like it's on shaky grounds.

Father__Merrin402d ago

Xbox sales decline is because of people like you always hailing "best deal in gaming" when it actually was hurting Xbox.

Gamepass should be changed to a different format with a revolving state of 100 games or so mainly indies and older AAA titles. Day one releases should be day one releases like they always was.bie massive que for the next Forza etc

shinoff2183402d ago

Gamepass might not be better but ms might be in a better state if they stop all the day one releases. It's hurting them and their game sales. It's clear as day that's what's happening.

Rynxie402d ago

That's more MS fault. They were willing to take a lost to try and take a big share of the market from Sony.

TheCaptainKuchiki402d ago

The whole Game pass strategy was built on the assumption that they would be able to purchase a few powerful publishers to make the service very appealing. Bethesda was first.
People say that it's ABK that approached MS but I don't believe it.
It was calculated. They wanted to purchase big publishers since the beginning. Now that they got blocked, I see them modifying this strategy.

FinalFantasyFanatic401d ago

@Rynxie,
That kind of tactic might have worked for them before, but they shot themselves in the foot this time. Not only that, but the amount of money they would need to consistent blow to keep feeding games into gamepass must be phenomenal.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 401d ago
Gardenia402d ago

I'm not sure but did the EU already approve of the deal? And does the UK decision have effect on other countries? Anyone knows?

tbagmonster402d ago

ms is going on with the deal regardless so not sure why everyone here is celebrating

mkis007402d ago

Well if ms wants to pull all of its assets out of uk then thats their only remedy until the appeal works.

Sunny_D402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

@tbag

What are you talking about? Are you referring to MS going forward with the deal despite the FTC from yesterday? Well today that has changed because what everyone once thought was a sure approval from the CMA is no longer the case. MS is definitely NOT going forward with the deal.

UltimateRacer402d ago

The EU haven’t made a final decision and we’re awaiting the CMAs findings/outcome. The UKs decision can have an effect on other country’s that haven’t already passed the deal like US/EU as the UKs findings may or may not also affect the EU/US market. Now I could be totally wrong so take what I’ve said with a pinch of salt or if you’re sceptical, a bag of salt.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 402d ago
DiRtY402d ago

MS already said they will keep going for it. It might take a little longer though.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media...

TGGJustin402d ago

They can try but that answer was pretty clear. Let them waste more time just to get told no again though.

theindiearmy402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

At the end of the day, MS could probably just pull out of the UK market and the deal would still be worth it to them from a business standpoint. Then it's the CMA that looks to be the anti-consumerist by forcing a major player out of the market. Not saying I want that, but damn that would be a power move and kind of funny. Microsoft just goes, "Welp...see ya later then."

MrDead402d ago

I hope they fail and the Activision deal collapses because if so this is a massive win for gaming and gamers, actual consumer protections and anti-competitive practices being used for once!!! I never thought I'd see the day.

jznrpg402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

@ theindiearmy After the US the UK is their biggest market. They can’t just pull out of UK so easily

Extermin8or3_402d ago

@theindiearmy you think MS is going to withdraw all operations from the UK market.... apart from anything the USA government would be beyond pissed given the UK is there closest partner in terms of defence etc. Senior people in intelligence circuits have made remarks before that the USA is the bank and the uk is the brains- the uk is known to be a world leader in surveillance and intelligence gathering and you can bet there's a symbiotic relationship in those industries with MS and other tech companies. That's just one small sector, not to mention the money MS would lose. They bought 2-% of london stock exchange for a reason. No Microsoft isn't going to do any such thing.

staticall402d ago

@theindiearmy
I'm sorry, what? Microsoft should pull out of UK market because of Xbox? Are you crazy? You know how many billions they'll lose and how many breach of contract lawsuits they'll face? And keep in mind all the software sales, licenses, hardware, subscription money, offices they rent, staff, datacenters and so on. It would be much cheaper for Microsoft to shut down the Xbox branch altogether than to pull out of such a big market. They're a huge company, you don't go «Screw you guys, i'm going home» because some deal didn't go your way, it's bad for business.

Not to mention, even if Microsoft pulls out of UK, CMA will still keep blocking the deal. Because Activision-Blizzard will not pull out of UK. Or else they'll lose a lot of money and their price will drop significantly.

This will be a lose-lose situation. This will be a very shortsighted, irrational, stupid act, not a power move.

zeuanimals402d ago

Playground Games and Rare are both based in the UK too. What? Are they gonna have to move all of them to the states? The devs can't even play their own game in their home country? Lmao

theindiearmy402d ago

LOL at anyone thinking I meant all of Microsoft should pull out. Obviously I meant just leave the UK gaming market. Didn't think that had to be clarified, as that's the entire context of this debacle.

badz149402d ago

@theindiearmy

pull out from the 2nd biggest xbox market because of this? hahahahaha and then what??

ah...you xbox fanatics are HILLARIOUS!

DiRtY253d ago

I think I was right and you were wrong.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 253d ago
Thundercat77402d ago

They can try but the decision was already made and also, there is the FTC and the Europeans.

Huge plot twist.

Bathyj402d ago

It might take a little never at this rate.

DiRtY253d ago

Might happen in 3 weeks at this rate.

ravens52402d ago

Let it go. Hope Starfield is a hit and then get into grind mode and *come a little closer*... MAKE GAMES!! Take a chance and make an original IP, You guys need a new Xbox mascot. Seems master cheif isn't the face anymore, COD won't be either.

neutralgamer1992402d ago

MS can appeal but CMA will likely win. It’s hard to defeat CMA

Hofstaderman402d ago

As I’ve always said the CMA don’t play around.

SICKINDIVIDUAL402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

Bobby kotick: 'i'm in danger '.....🤣🤣
...lmao he's getting canned.

Extermin8or3_402d ago

MS there trying to make out the CMA simply don't understand the market the level of patronising crap they've come out with during this is ridiculous. The CMA assembles a panel of experts for each major case they investigate aswell as relies on loads of 2nd and 3rd party data and interviews with loads of people and are meticulous in their reports. If anything the one the unorthodox u-turn on gaming in MS's favour actually weakens MS's case.

DiRtY253d ago

I think I woke up and was right.

IamFrasierCrane402d ago

If only they put this much effort into making games smh

Sonic1881402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

@Dirty
Sure it will 😁

Microsoft Activision Blizzard appeal: what happens next?

- CMA has won vast majority of appeals
- Very high bar for appeal to be successful
- Will almost certainly push into 2024
- If appeal succeeds it goes BACK to CMA for final word LoL

https://youtu.be/Lbx1rCNp3m...

Profchaos402d ago

They wouldn't back away publicly that would be a bad look it's still a emotional business something you've worked for has been blocked and you've wasted years you're going to be angry and pushing for a way forward.

I don't expect them to give up but it's fairly concrete once the CMA makes a decision

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 253d ago
jonny897402d ago

Microsoft is very desperate, they will not leave this deal.

SullysCigar402d ago

The trouble is, it will cost much time and money to fight. As it stands right now, they're already billions of dollars in the hole with ABK.

At some point, Microsoft may well run out of patience and tell the xbox division that if they want to buy publishers/developers/IPs then they'd better make some effing money and stand on their own two feet.

outsider1624402d ago

Ok so this deal is off. What happens to that 70billion dollars? They get it back or something?

SullysCigar402d ago

^ Well the money isn't spent, so presumably nothing changes. Xbox don't hold that money, Microsoft does. It might be repurposed for something unrelated to xbox.

If xbox want to use an amount of money that they haven't generated, they'll have to beg for it again, which will take time to process and build the proposal, so it's not happening any time soon. The only other way is to earn the money you spend on acquisitions, and as we've seen from the financial reports, they're hardly profitable and their hardware revenue is plummeting almost as quickly as PlayStations is rising.

crazyCoconuts402d ago

They have a deadline in the contract, if they don't finalize it by the deadline (June-ish?) MS pays Activision like 2B even if it gets rejected by regulators

Hofstaderman402d ago

I’m waiting for this day and it may be sooner than expected based on current insider disclosures.

UltimateRacer402d ago

You know what’s going to happen with Xbox, they’ll put all there time and effort into this ABK nonsense even if that means this outcome running into 2024, Xbox console sales will continue to plummet except for a small boost from Starfield regardless of wether or not it launches as a buggy mess and then you’ll have little to no output from MS studios and anything that does release or shadow drop will be of poor quality/will sell poorly because of gamepass. Ultimately MS are in this position of desperation because they think they can money hat the industry, continue to make bad decisions and ultimately have incompetent leaders. What I can see happening in the not so distant future is MS becoming a 3rd party publisher and putting their games everywhere.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 402d ago
SICKINDIVIDUAL402d ago

Well at this point it's already cost them upwards of $3 billion if the deal doesn't happen by June....I don't care how rich a company is nobody throws away billions of dollars without someone eventually stepping in.

Great news for gamers and this makes sense with regards to high level management at MS not being happy with profits....Phil thought he had it all figured out LMAO....go make games clown.

Hofstaderman402d ago

For all we know the higher ups at MS may have gotten wind of this before the news officially broke hence their reported stance on XBOX division.

RauLeCreuset402d ago

The thought of Xbox spending billions to tell the world Playstation has the better exclusives is hilarious.

darksky402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

If the regulations deem it to be monopolistic then they will block it and I hope they do. Buying out some of the biggest the ip's in the gaming market is simply a bad move from a consumer point of view since it blocks out a huge percentage of gamers.

tbagmonster402d ago

they are still going on with the deal and have other ways to buy up seperate chunks and avoid all this

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 402d ago
-Mika-402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

The CMA’s concerns are that Cloud gaming has tripled but MS accounts for 60-70% of Cloud gaming. Did they not think the reason for the growth in Cloud gaming was because of MS Investments in the last few years? Third party AAA games, touch controls on mobile and it being a subscription instead of buy2play has made Xbox the #1 cloud service in the UK. Why are they being punished for this? This is a really bad move from the CMA!

SullysCigar402d ago

What, by monopolising another market?

-Mika-402d ago

What monopoly? This deal wouldn’t give MS domination in the cloud market, because literally any cloud provider that wanted it could get access to MS games. What’s more likely to happen without this merger is that smaller companies are priced out of content, and MS signs exclusivity deals to squeeze anyone else out from competing. This is only going to hurt the cloud market.

Extermin8or3_402d ago

Post merger MS wouldn't have to provide anything but COD to other companies ABK have many other IP's and the deals were all about COD. Also the issue isn't the current players it's more the obstacle it would prevent to new entrants. Cloud infrastructure is really costly to even start and get off the ground. If some of the most popular IP's are able to be witheld from your service it's such an uphill battle as to be impossible to enter the gaming market.

porkChop402d ago

I don't think it's fair to say they've "monopolized" cloud when both Google and Amazon failed in that market. MS is clearly the most successful in cloud gaming but it's not their fault that other companies made terrible decisions. For example, I've never even seen an ad anywhere for Luna. Amazon basically sent that service out to die. Stadia had the advertising but it had no value proposition and required a sizable investment just to try out the service. How is MS responsible for that?

shinoff2183402d ago

Mika

I'm sure they know more then you about the subject. They had to of had their reasons. Hell here's a new one for you guys. Maybe Sony paid then and the cloud reason is just bs lol. Enjoy

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 402d ago
KyRo402d ago

New and emerging market? Like we haven't heard streaming being the future for decades. Just like mobile was supposed to be the end for consoles. No one is pissed at this decision except fanboys.

Thundercat77402d ago

Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean you can call it a bad move.

-Mika-402d ago

The only good news out of this whole ordeal is that Phil might be fired for this acquisition failing. That usually how it goes at these big companies. We need new leadership at this point and Phil doesn't know what he doing.

dumahim402d ago

Yeah, I wonder if they'd go that route. Sounds like they're paying up $3B just for the deal not going through. Who knows what other costs are involved in this whole thing. That's a tough bill to soak up and no payoff in the end.

derek402d ago

@Mika, they are making this decision to protect what they see as a market in its infancy to allow other to come into it should they chose.

-Mika-402d ago

What others? Cloud gaming is an expensive industry to jump into. MS offered these people access to COD and their first party titles for 10 years, free of charge! They are not getting a better deal than that. Do you honestly think these small cloud companies can afford to put COD on their services?

rippermcrip402d ago

Yes, Microsoft accounting for 2/3 is exactly the issue. The deal would make them even more powerful in that area, preventing competition.

ChasterMies402d ago

From my perspective, Microsoft is no.1 in cloud gaming because cloud gaming sucks and xCloud is included with Game Pass ultimate, and Game Pass subscribers have to pay for Game Pass ultimate if they want to play games on-line. Imagine if Microsoft adds an even more expensive tier to play CoD. Imagine if World of Warcraft is cloud only. That’s what CMA is worried about.

CptDville402d ago

You are so naive, it’s kinda cute!

Chevalier402d ago

"I don't think it's fair to say they've "monopolized" cloud"

It's also not fair to cry crocodile tears about Playstation and Nintendo having better games that they should be allowed to buy a whole publisher. It's NOT Playstation or Nintendos fault they have better games now is it?

Maybe Xbox can take the $70 billion and I don't know MAKE new IPs?! Like how Playstation and Nintendo have done.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 402d ago
Show all comments (395)
90°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot071d 1h ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda19h ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff218310h ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6389h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda8h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel18h ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

220°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer1d 12h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning771d 10h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv721d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning771d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot1d 12h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv721d 10h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC1d 8h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno1d 7h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier1d 4h ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

BlindMango10h ago

The reason they would need to "partner with Microsoft" is simply to make a game that's part of a franchise that Microsoft owns. Meaning they're probably going to make a new Spyro game - they're still an independent studio, but are making a game in a franchise that Microsoft owns. It's kind of like Remedy partnering with Rockstar to be able to make the Max Payne remakes.

shinoff218310h ago

It was probably the deal to get released from Ms

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier1d 4h ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

PhillyDonJawn16h ago

No, I'm sure MS can and does step in when they want something done specifically but I'm also sure they let them also work independently

shinoff218310h ago

I highly highly doubt this. Ms controls all. The guys aren't gonna be allowed to just shut something down like that without approval. No way

Elda1d 4h ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer22h ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Don't worry about my comments.

PhillyDonJawn16h ago

Right probably something like astrobot

romulus2315h ago

Nah he said "uninteresting", lots of people are interested in Astro Bot.

Elda13h ago

Never Astro Bot. Astro Bot looks better than any exclusive released on XB this entire generation & believe there hasn't been much.

Asplundh13h ago

Crash 4 was good, so I'm hopeful.

PhillyDonJawn11h ago

Hey you said that about SOT and looks like many ppl on PS is playing it. You also found bugsnax interesting ffs your opinion hold no weight lol.

Elda11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Bugsnax is BS, tried it & quickly deleted it. It's a game that fits right on Gamepass. PS5 owners that are probably playing the boring SOT you could count on one hand. LMAO!!...don't try to come for me.

PhillyDonJawn9h ago

So you admit bugsnax interested you enough to try? 😂 someone gotta call you out on the foolishness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9h ago
Show all comments (35)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein2d ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff21831d 18h ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear211d 18h ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha1d 3h ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy011d 22h ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing691d 19h ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing691d 16h ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (15)