290°

Marvel's Avengers Spider-Man Isn't Associated with Insomniac Games' Version of the Character

Crystal Dynamics has said it is creating its own take on Spider-Man for the upcoming release of Marvel's Avengers.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
1397d ago Replies(1)
1397d ago Replies(2)
blue881397d ago (Edited 1397d ago )

I don’t understand why they make the spider man dlc exclusive to PlayStation and not use the PlayStation version of spider man. Crystal Dynamics must hate money I guess.

Sunny_D1397d ago

Cause it will confuse people into thinking they are in the same universe... if Insomniac decides to something story wise In the Spiderman sequel then it might contradict with the story in the avengers game.

AspiringProGenji1397d ago

I don’t think people are that dumb to not differentiate the two spidermans. I mean Spiderman was in Ultimate Alliance 3 for Switch and that didn’t have anything to do with Spiderman PS4. Besides this is a Post launch DLC meaning spiderman may not have anything to do with the story

CobraKai1397d ago

It woulda been perfect, especially how Spidey mentions the Avengers are on the west coast. Now we’ll get to scrutinize CD’s take on Spider-Man on every level. Hehehehe.

JBlaze2261397d ago

I hope it will be a timed DLC because this will cause a rift with the fan base

badz1491396d ago

what fanbase? when was the release of the last Avengers game? LEGO! and there is only one Spidey game this gen and it's exclusive for the PS4 AND it's currently the best selling superhero game EVER. and Iron Man VR also released recently exclusively for the PS4 too to great success. so...doesn't that mean that most if not all of the fanbase is on the PS4 already?

1396d ago
JBlaze2261396d ago

Not really because yeah exclusivity is not bad but doing it to multiplat games locking out a character to one console is not good. What if they announce in future that wolverine is going to be xbox or PC exclusives.

1396d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (29)
60°

It's Not Too Late For Suicide Squad To Learn From Marvel's Avengers

TheGamer writes, "It feels like live service history repeating itself right now, but it's not too late to change that."

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
130°

I’m so ready for Suicide Squad to fill the Avengers void in my life

Marvel’s Avengers didn’t soar properly on PS5 and Xbox, but Kill the Justice League looks like it will improve on it in every way.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
poppatron127d ago

I can’t work out if this guy is just being sarcastic

Leeroyw127d ago

This website pumps out one shill article after the other. Does not qualify as journalism.

ShwaaMan127d ago

Said the guy who just got a big check from WB.

YourMommySpoils127d ago

Does that mean it will have a thousand pointless costumes like Avengers did, not related to the game or source?

coolbeans127d ago

"Guy who's excited for Suicide Squad to fill the void left by The Avengers' closure."

Traecy127d ago

I'll be checking it out on day one of release.

Show all comments (12)
180°

Why Have Many of the Online Multiplayer Games of the Past Five Years Failed?

Here's a look at why so many online-multiplayer games from the past five years have struggled to retain players and their attention.

ChasterMies229d ago

Or put another way, why don’t people want to invest in an on-line storefront?

sparky77229d ago

It's simply FOMO.

Gamers always go back to their staples like COD or Fortnite. Those games have constant content and leaving them for another game means getting left behind. Why start a new game and be behind when you can stay with a game you already excel at.

Number1TailzFan229d ago (Edited 229d ago )

COD is replaced every year or almost every year, it has no time to hold a player base. 3-4 years is a good timeline for a sequel IMO if the game has enough content to begin with, maybe add a couple of free content updates a bit later after release if needed, and job done until the next game.

Soldier of Fortune 2 was one of my first few online FPS games apart from RTCW and a couple of others, and that had a couple of free patches which added in new weapons, maps and a new game mode in just a year or so. I hope the series makes a comeback, I heard MS owns it now and it has been dormant for a while.

The only sequel that came fast (just 1 year later) that impressed me with extra content over the original was L4D2, makes me wonder what happened with Valve. If they can do that in one year then what have they been doing since..

-Foxtrot229d ago (Edited 229d ago )

Because it's not about putting out a fully completed game packed with content and something that actually works

It's about putting something out broken and barebones, slowly drip feed content with a roadmap and offering tons of MTs which they hope people will buy.

I miss when you'd just get games like Killzone or Halo and they'd get a couple of DLC packs then the developers would move onto the next game. Problem is they started to be influenced by COD where future games had to have gimmicks, weapon mods, loadouts, killstreaks and other shit which just become about what you had unlocked rather than skill.

The last multiplayer game I really enjoyed was Uncharted 2s, it was literally just two boosters and everyone started with the same weapons. It was great and felt like it was more about skill but then we got Uncharted 3 and 4 where the COD influence creeped in thinking that everything had to be bigger rather than sticking to the fanbase they had.

Nitrowolf2229d ago

i agree. i used to love MP games for these titles, and be excited about the map packs and such. now it's we will release one mode and one map, and see how people take to the game. Flops? cool move on.

isarai228d ago

Even before the PS3 generation ended, I was already longing for a return to simplistic MP without all the XP, booster, perks, and ridiculous custom loadouts full of op exploitation. Like there's definitely a huge audience for that, but there's NO classic style simple MP modes anymore, I'm just asking for some

ZeekQuattro229d ago

Most people don't have the time to invest into playing multiple GAAS and stick to just one. It also doesn't help that so many games in that field only have a roadmap laid out for the first month or so. Hard to keep people invested when you don't give them a reason to stick around after the initial launch month.

excaliburps228d ago

Yep. I know what you mean. I can't play more than 1-2 live service games at a time (this includes shooters) since it's just so overwhelming.

shinoff2183229d ago (Edited 229d ago )

My theory , well online gaming just sucks, so many online games recently that if done the right way could've been dope ass single player games. One that comes to mind evil dead. What a waste of the title

Show all comments (15)