520°

Call Of Duty is Dead

Finally, the mighty Call Of Duty franchise has fallen and more and more gamers are waking up to the fact that this series is long over do for some major renovations. So can Activision bring back the spirit of Call Of Duty or is it time to bury this dead franchise for good.

Read Full Story >>
goodnewsgaming.com
Sciurus_vulgaris2664d ago (Edited 2664d ago )

Call of Duty is far from dead. The franchise is just on the decline. Which that was bound to happen eventually.

bouzebbal2662d ago

Best selling franchise in 2016 is dead ? What a dumb article.

Tussin1872662d ago (Edited 2662d ago )

3 of the games were in the top ten in 2016 were COD games. I guess they forgot to read their investment details. Activision said they were disappointed with sales. That doesn't equate dead. For them not selling 20 million is disappointing. That's the difference.

And to all the people who wish is dead. No one is forcing you to buy the games
If there's so many other good games out there , like you say, why does it even matter to you at this point. The market is there for the actual fans of the franchise.

I think I'm starting to get it. Deep down you really want the game because you guys sure do talk about a lot. Don't like then don't buy it. Simple as that
From what we hear they might be putting boots back on the ground.

I've read many complaints on that front but I have a striking feeling, that even if they do go back on the ground, you guys will still complain.

Kaneki-Ken2662d ago

Because COD4 Remastered was the only reason it sold well but by itself, Infinite Warfare probably would have been worst selling franchise in 2016

4Sh0w2662d ago

lol, if COD is dead, please somebody kill me. Sure Activision was disappointed but that's just because COD is a cash cow and they expect it to sell bigger numbers every year= not achieving higher sales is far from dead. btw, COD IW campaign was very good, the multi is decent pretty much the same as usual and no the graphics are not gonna omg wow you but that's never been COD strength. Personally the only big negative imo is the microtransaction crap but that's not unique to COD.

riibhu2662d ago

@Tussin187
All the hate you see are in internet forums only. And these people who talk big on internet forums are the minority of the actual market.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2662d ago
2662d ago
IamTylerDurden12662d ago

BO3 sold massively and was the best selling game of 2015. Infinite Warfare is the best selling game of 2016. Cod is far from dead, i just think ppl are tired of the future theme a bit. Luckily the next Cod sounds like it will go back in time to WW2 or Vietnam, which is very intriguing imo.

MRMagoo1232661d ago

I agree , I think it was the theme this time that hampered sales, I would put money on it selling massively once again if they did ww2 again

Profchaos2661d ago

No it wasn't the best selling game this year bf1 recorded better numbers globally

-Foxtrot2664d ago

Oh...no...I'm so sad....the pain....it hurts

...

Oh well, maybe people will actually start to buy games which are actually good and where the developers have actually put some effort into them.

zaherdab2662d ago

I don't see why you consider these games are lacking effort and that they are not good ...
there's a good production value in these games and a decent amount of content. for people whole like this type of games i think they are still top of the class and those who were never interested in them won't magically like them

naruga2662d ago

Foxtrot is right ...better be and left dead ...so many quality games are left in the shadows because people mass playing this sloppy mediocrity (is bad even for an FPS) ...also how many games went ridiculous because trying to have a share from COD s pie ..it destroyed all FPS after it

Newmanator2662d ago

Zahdab-you can't be saying such true and logical statements on N4G.

Vegamyster2662d ago

naruga

You may not like CoD but you can't honestly say they're bad, they give you good amount of content for your money compared to many of shooters. The issue with the series is fatigue, there has been one every year since 2003 and the core mechanics haven't changes drastically other than the movement/perk/KS system.

TorpeAlex2662d ago

You can certainly opine that the games aren't good, but it's nonsense to look at Infinite Warfare (or any of them really) and say, "The developers didn't put any effort into this." The budget and team size are 100% on display for these games every release.

Sharky2312662d ago

I felt like infinite warfare was a step in the right direction as far as the story. It was the first cod story that I actually cared about in awhile!

senorfartcushion2662d ago

What is bad about the franchise?

The shooting mechanics are second to none and they release anual games with the same quality.

yeahokwhatever2662d ago

COD's shooting mechanics are second to:Unreal Tournament, Battlefield, Halo, Doom, Counter Strike, Halflife, Overwatch, etc. I love COD, I've got over 800 hours logged in 1 year from freaking Blops2. BUT, I don't think the shooting is somehow better than several other games, I think the multiplayer is just consistently good. Match to match, I know what I'm getting into. While I feel the guns are far more fun to shoot in BF, I might get on a sever where people play the objective, or I might get into a server with a bunch of mountain goat snipers and get bored. If I have 30 minutes to kill, I KNOW i can play at least 1 fun round of COD.

nopeola2662d ago

It's not dead but,

Quality of the series overall has been declining for years, mainly since they switched to focus on multiplayer, only exeception being COD4 since it was the first to start. If you look back at the earliest games COD 1&2 for example, the focus was on telling a story, it was linear(still is now, but just not as good) and well made and took on average 4 years to make. They actually got awards for it, look up 2003 COD awards. They recently brought back a longer 3 year development cycle, but before it was a 1 year cycle and quality suffered because they had to rush it, which lead to reused maps, assets, and "innovation" like fish physics and a gutted single player campaign that's a fraction of what it used to be. I get multiplayer sells, but they neither take the time or effort to do it as well as they did their single player back in the day. In fact look at Titanfall 2 for a glimpse at how they could do COD, because even though sales weren't amazing(due to launching alongside BF1) the quality was, both in single player and multiplayer. Hopefully it does better with the new one, but I myself moved on to other games.

IamTylerDurden12662d ago

I think ppl like you are unfairly maligning Infinite Warfare simply bc the future premise is getting old, and well... bc it's just the popular thing to do. Infinite Warfare actually had a very good campaign and it was quite gorgeous on PS4 Pro with a 4K HDR. Kit Harrington was appealing as the antagonist and the story actually kept you invested. The mp was similar to BO3, which had solid, competent mp. Perhaps they could've innovated more on the mp side, but it wasn't inherently bad, it was just weaker than the strong sp. However, judging from the outside Zombies seemed a bit better in BO3.

I actually like what they are doing with the Sabotage DLC. The four different themed maps is a cool idea, especially the Neon map where enemies dissolve into a smattering of futuristic pixels when you kill them. I also like the idea of taking you to a classic 1990's summer camp (in Zombies) ripped straight from the campy horror movies we grew up on.

nopeola2662d ago (Edited 2662d ago )

Im not even talking about inifinite warfare, im talking broadly about the decade before when they made ww2 games that focused on story. I know its subjective but alot of ppl felt those games were of quality bc of the attention to detail and "telling a story" namely a war story. The releases after cod 4 focused on increasingly convaluted stories and were not imo up to the same level of narrative or quality service that inifinity ward gave to ww2, or cod4. Thats mainly because back then they took their time with 4 years development, and a focus on telling a story to base their game on. IMO they watered down the story in their games since cod4 and quality went downhill mainly due to a annual release schedule. Its better now with 3 year rotation between studios, but they have alot to prove and judging by dislikes in favor of ita main competitor battlefield they still dont get it.

But to give them credit I thought single player on advanced warfare was interesting esp having spacey. Havent played infinite warfare though so I cant comment on that.

_-EDMIX-_2662d ago

?

Except good is a subjective concept and I'm pretty positive despite how much you don't like Call of Duty that they're developers put effort into their releases.

I think maybe you need to accept having an opinion about something does not render it "fact".....

Stop worrying about what other people play. I'm pretty positive that the massive install base that purchases Call of Duty every year it's probably going to continue to do so for a pretty long number of years. It is very clear that this company and its teams are doing something correct if people continue to purchase Call of Duty in fact I'm not even sure if there is even a legitimate second to something like Call of Duty in terms of first person shooters that release yearly.

nopeola2662d ago

I think your overeading, Im not worried about what other ppl like im giving my opinion like everyone else. And dang you sound like you work for them i didnt have to scroll up far to read your fanboy comments defending the game on another post, calm your nips.

_-EDMIX-_2662d ago

@no- don't care

" I don't even play Call of Duty anymore and I'm not attacking its fan base. "

If you don't like it , you don't need to buy it, no one's actually forcing you to.

riibhu2662d ago

If you or any as a matter of fact think COD sucks then don't buy it. No one's forcing you.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2661d ago
PhoenixUp2664d ago

Yes one of the highest selling franchises last year is a dead series 😕

Seriously use logic before you equate Call of Duty to a dead franchise like Medal of Honor

2662d ago
FallenAngel19842664d ago

If an allegedly "dead franchise" can still commercially outperform most other games during a given year, what does that say about the rest of the industry? You going to say everything with less success is dead as well?

Summons752662d ago

We've all been saying it for years. Good sales ≠ a good game. Every year since COD 4 it's been the same. COD gets announced and everyone is hyped, the game comes out and sells well, people play the game and see it is exactly the same just reskinned and everyone gets mad and says it's terrible, COD gets announced and everyone is hyped claiming "they will give it a chance"...rinse/repeat.

COD is trash and a plague on our market. May have been the "best-selling" game of last year but that was mostly for the COD4 remaster because I hear nothing but negative remarks on Infinite Warfare and it was Battlefield was way more popular.

sales ≠ quality

_-EDMIX-_2662d ago

No.

I'm sorry but you need to accept that there is a large amount of people that enjoy that game regardless of how you feel about it please stop trying to attack the people that play games just cuz you have a different opinion I don't even play Call of Duty anymore and I'm not attacking its fan base.

They're going to continue to buy that game every year , dear God get over it!!!

ironcrow23862662d ago

More than ten CoD games and it uses quantum break in the video?? Coo- coo :D

spicelicka2661d ago

lol yea wth is that all about

Show all comments (96)
90°

CDPR say Witcher 4 will be different from Witcher 3: "We don't want to be stuck in the same spot"

The next Witcher game will still be an RPG but players can expect new things as CD Projekt Red want to push boundaries and discover new ways of storytelling.

Terry_B12h ago

Each of the 3 existing Witcher games is pretty different from each other..

Kaii11h ago

My only issue with 3 was with the combat

helicoptergirl11h ago

Bethesda seems like a studio that is "stuck in the same spot". Development wise. Glad CDPR are wary of that element in game design.

Hugodastrevas54m ago

This can either go very well or very badly. I hope the latter.

310°

[Exclusive] Xbox Reaches Agreement With Batman: Arkham Trilogy Creators For A New AAA Game

Ex-Rocksteady directors' Hundred Star is collaborating with Xbox Game Studios Publishing for its first-ever AAA game.

Lightning7710h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Highly doubt it'll be an actual Batman game that IP belongs to WB Games along with other DC property.

They're making an action adventure game. IMO I think it needs to be another Marvel game despite MS already have Blade as that action Marvel game. Dead Pool? Punisher?

Realistically it'll probably be a new IP entirely.

The_Hooligan9h ago

I agree with you. I think I'll be a brand new IP. Now it could be a superhero themed, kind of like infamous. Speaking of which, Suckerpunch needs to make one after Ghost 2.

neutralgamer19929h ago

would love a infamous collection for ps5/pc

Lightning778h ago

I definitely think it'll be super hero themed game 100%. Something MS needs in their portfolio.

ThinkThink6h ago

Please, no more super hero games.

PhillyDonJawn6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Dead Pool or Punisher would be amazing!!!
Don't tease me like that man lol. I see them making a new IP that's like an arkham knight clone

Dirty_Lemons2h ago

I loved the old Punisher game back in the day. Those executions never got old.

porkChop1h ago

I don't think it needs to be Marvel. It needs to be a totally new IP. That's what Rocksteady should have done after Arkham City. They've pigeonholed themselves as DC devs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
MIDGETonSTILTS179h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I hope these devs needed support to start/finish (like Stalker 2), vs are basically done with the game but wanted to secure an exclusivity-bonus because they know Xbox needs a system seller (like Titanfall).

It’s a bit strange that they’d rather invest in this game than Tangoworks’ TWO canceled projects; or just trust a single dev from their existing massive stable of talent to emerge with a system-seller themselves anytime soon.

Either way, it is just cool that we’ll likely get a new IP from the geniuses behind the Arkham Trilogy. I wonder how creative they’ll get now that they aren’t married to an established franchise.

darthv729h ago

This is about the former co-founders of Rocksteady and their new studio. So naturally it makes people think its Batman related with the way its worded, even though its not.

-Foxtrot8h ago

Exclusive? Sure

This year alone Microsoft has changed their plans so much with Xbox regarding multiplatform releases as they step closer to just being a full blown third party publisher and it's only been 4-5 months, imagine where we'll be once this game is finished. It will be a completely different landscape.

ThinkThink6h ago

I don't think MS will ever go completely full 3rd party with all of their games. I can see them looking towards expanding their own mobile store and moving into Mac as ways of expanding. I'm sure ms will bring more exclusives over to ps and nintendo, but I don't think it'll be as many games as you think it will. I hope I'm wrong.

Lightning775h ago

The ever contradictions thoughts and actions of MS definitely says otherwise MS changed up so much on the past 6 months of the year I lost count.

Though I'm more declined to believe they also won't go full 3rd party also.

But.

This year they're having Renaissance a super bowl of gaming with Gamepass this year. BO6, older ABK games, Avowed, Indy and other 3rd party exclusives all to grow and expand gamepass. If these games don't grow the service or grow only a little bit. Then you can fully expect MS to hit the red button and put everything everywhere. Satya will have full Xbox take over doing what he wants from that point on next year.

It's up to Xbox to advertise these games and gamepass in the next 6 months or so get the word out.

Profchaos5h ago

The more the news evolves the more I'm inclined to believe we will see MS embrace full third party status but not call it third party in their word soup ways.

It will be Xbox everywhere plays best on a Xbox.

Next gen Xbox is rumoured to be a reference design similar to the 3d0 where any company can make and sell it.

If you're offloading hardware costs to a third party yet still profiting from the games then you've cut out losses on the hardware you still have a store front that users can use and still make a 30 percent cut on that.

Your games sell for a profit on PS and Nintendo platforms and on Xbox reference hardware along with PC

You lose .kney on DLC and games sold on a competitor storefront they are seemingly already comfortable with this.

The ms bean counters are coming for the ROI that was promised they don't care if they kill the brand as it stands Xbox was never a profitable business it was always just done for reputation

PhillyDonJawn5h ago

@Lightning the would end the console then. No one would buy Xbox over PS at that point cause now you get both with just a PS. If GP flop for them, Logically, rolling back on GP would be the smarter than to do. No more day 1 title. Less quality titles. They'd lose subs but people would go back to buying the games.

Lightning773h ago

@Philly They could scale back gamepass put Indies only, AAA 1st party games coming 4 to 6 months from release. The thing is MS will have to tell their fans to buy their games again and that's gonna take years and years to condition them to buy games again. MS will lose money from that also. They'll lose out on gamepass revenue, lose out on games sales because their fans don't buy as many games anymore.

I can't see them scaling back or axing gamepass it does make them allot of money, they just want more money from it. They're not gonna condition their fans to start buying games either.

As I said they'll go full 3rd party and yes you ate right, if they do that then there would be no reason to buy the next Xbox. I know j won't be, you better hope the next 6 months they advertise the games and GP there little hearts out because this could be it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
purple1017h ago

Spawn (as well as master chief) are the only characters I associate with Xbox. Are there more I can’t remember?

rlow17h ago

Gears is another big game one.

purple1017h ago

Yeh big game, do you know the name of the lead character. Or team of lead characters. I don’t

rlow16h ago

Marcus, Dom, Cole Train. And I can’t remember the fourth.

Profchaos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Also the chick from gears 5 seems to pop up on all their modern advertising I can't remember her name either.

Cars also feature heavily in a Xbox ad it's always master chief front and centre with cars and maybe a gears character hanging around

Show all comments (25)
80°

Boosteroid Plans On Adding More AAAA Titles Exclusively To The Service

The VP of Marketing at Boosteroid revealed that the company is in talks with major publishers to secure exclusive games on the service.

Relientk771d 17h ago

So they're adding Skull and Bones to their service? That doesn't seem exciting at all lol.