120°

AMD Hawaii GPU to undercut Nvidia's GTX 780

If all the rumours surrounding AMD’s new line of graphics cards are to be believed, this Q4 is going to be a bloodbath in the graphics card sector.

mewhy323944d ago

AMD is on a role now. I mean they're suddenly getting millions upon millions of chips out the door with the PS4 and xbone abeit less power gpu for xbone. Now they're bustin' up nVidia. Run with it!!!!!

bicfitness3943d ago

Price has never been the issue with AMD. Their driver-support - or lack therof - is. I waited 6 months for my last AMD driver CF 7990, before just swapping for Nvidia cards. Doesn't matter how cheap your product is if it doesn't have any software support.

Perhaps a greater marketshare and console foothold will smarten them up a bit. I'm not a brand loyalist - consoles, PC parts or otherwise - so if they could straighten themselves out, I'd build my next rig with AMD GPUs for sure.

infamous-butcher3943d ago

why buy a dual gpu, when you know that there are issues with the drivers for them?

bicfitness3943d ago

For enthusiast level performance obviously. Why would you even ask that?

jeffgoldwin3943d ago

@mewhy32

I dunno if you've never watched pc hardware before, but its a very normal cycle and has been for over a decade+ where they leap frog each other back and forth.

Up next in the news, NVidia releases new gpu faster than blah, blah, blah.

steve30x3944d ago

If they can match the GTX780 but at a reasonable price then I will go back to AMD / ATI. I havent owned an AMD GPU since I owned the miserable HD4870 for a month. That thing was aweful

awi59513944d ago

MY 4870 was awesome i dont know what you are talking about. I had that card for like 4 years and it played all games on max. You must have bought a cheap one that ran too hot because those cards had high temps. I had that card untill BF3 came out at that point i was rocking 3 of them in my pc and it still ran BF3 at 30 fps on ultra. I upgraded just for direct x 11 effects.

sinjonezp3944d ago

As much as I praise amd for their price/performance solutions, there driver updates hold me back from switching from nvidia. If they were to update as well as nvidia they could take the market share swiftly.

Codeman4203944d ago

Agreed, the drivers for Nvidia cards are so much better than ATI's, thats the main reason i got rid of two 5970's and went to one 660ti.

jeffgoldwin3943d ago

Nvidia cards run cooler too.

GentlemenRUs3944d ago

As long as its cheaper then GeForce, I'll start leaning towards AMD again.

hollabox3944d ago

Is it me or are graphics too damn expensive? Bring back the days when top of the line graphics cards cost $300 rather than $600 plus. My personal limit for graphics cards is $400, never paid more than that, don't see the value in return with anything higher.

papashango3944d ago

$400 will buy you a 7970...

that's high end bro.

hollabox3943d ago

Sorry my card is still high end, using Nvidia GTX 670 overclocked to 1300 boost clock. I'm looking to go back to AMD after having so many driver issues with Nvidia after all my friends claimed they got their crap together. But like I said paying $600 for one of the newest high end video cards I don't see the return on investment since I upgrade about every 18 months.

papashango3943d ago

I actually own this sapphire 7970. got it for $400

I've yet to come across a driver issue. Probably the most solid GPU i've purchased.

I've owned

x1800xt
HD 3870
HD 4970
HD 5870
HD 6970
HD 7970

Only issue I had was with my 3870. I would freeze ingame often and had to hard boot my pc. This was back in 05ish. AMD drivers have been good to me since.

hollabox3943d ago (Edited 3943d ago )

I hated my ATi 3870 as well, no issues regarding crashes but it was so slow in DX10 games, DX9 it performed decent. I have owned the following graphics cards listed below, some I upgraded because of slow performance and missing features, some died, others either ran too hot or too loud with no or limited aftermarket cooling.

AMD/ATI
ATI 9000 Pro
ATI 9700 Non Pro
ATI AIW800
ATI X1800 XT
ATI 3870
ATI 4870
AMD 6970

Nvidia
Riva TNT 2
Geforce 2 MX
Geforce 3 TI
Geforce TI4400
Geforce 6800 GT
Geforce GTX 460
Geforce GTX 670

Voodoo 3

Out of all of my graphics cards I probably like the ATI 4870 the most. Great framerates, ran cool at 54C gaming, and not too expensive. In fact this card is still being used in a relative computer. AMD 9700 was my 2nd best or atleast compared to my failed TI4400. Third best is probably my GTX 670. When its not having random driver crashes, crash to desktop driver failed to respond its still pretty damn fast.

Worst cards Geforce GTX 6800 GT from Gigabyte. It was fast but this card only lasted 6 months before it died, thats pretty bad for a $400 graphics card that only lasted half a year. 2nd worst Geforce TI 4400, died on me in 8 months, shoddy performance with anisotropic filtering enabled. Third worst is probably my Voodoo 3 GC. This card lacked features, 256X256 max textures resolution, couldn't do true 32 bit color even though GLIDE was pretty good at faking it.

papashango3943d ago

A fellow voodoo owner and a 3870 owner.

I got hooked on PC gaming on the voodoo 2. I've gone through my fair share of nvidia cards but none as special as that voodoo.

Its rare to meet other 3870 owners. considering the reign of the 8800 series

Good times

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3943d ago
awi59513942d ago

Nividia and ATI both suck i remember the days when you could crossfire and SLI 3 or 4 cheap cards and kick the highend cards asses. Well NIvida and ATI teamed up to put a stop to that crap so now cards only have one sli or crossfire link. Thats a bunch of bull crap we should have to option to link more than 2 cards. ATI and nivida are full of crap for that it was a total dick move they both agreed on.

Show all comments (20)
150°

AMD Could Revolutionize Handheld Gaming In 2024

Shaz from GL writes: "AMD could spur the beginning of a new era in handheld gaming with their upcoming APUs"

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
rlow115d ago

To me the most important hardware is the battery. Doesn’t matter how powerful the chips are.

ABizzel115d ago

Eh…. It’s a combination of multiple things.

The battery is hugely important as it allows you to have ideally 4 - 5 hour gaming sessions.

The more powerful the processor the more games developers can share to the handheld, nd of course the better said games perform.

From there display, software, and ergonomics matter, as a good display/software will allow games to be more vivid, run at variable fps 30/40/60 ideally, and good ergonomics means it’s comfortable to play for said 4 - 5 hours. Everything else is gravy at that point.

rlow114d ago

I know we all want more power. But it’s sad that 4-5 hours is considered good now. It really shows how batteries have progressed at a much slower pace than hungry components.

redrum0614d ago

Of course it matters how powerful the chips are for it to be future proof. Don't you want to be able to play new games?

Neonridr14d ago

the Switch proves that you don't need the most cutting edge power out there to be successful.

RaiderNation14d ago

@Neonrdr that doesn't prove anything because only Nintendo could get away with that. Their games aren't the most complex/graphically ambitious and Nintendo fans don't care.

Vits14d ago

@Neonridr

If anything, the Switch proves the exact point "redrum06" was making. Yes, it might be successful, but it's definitely not future-proof. Just look at how many games and franchises completely skip the platform.

redrum0613d ago

I have a Switch, and recently got the Legion Go. I havent touched the Switch ever since, purely because of its inability to play even older games at a decent frame rate. For anyone wanting to play multiplatform games as well, people should skip the Switch.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 13d ago
Marcus Fenix14d ago

There’s no way you’re getting that 40CU 16-core APU in a handheld. That’s too hot and power hungry for that. The highest end APU they’re suggesting is going to end up in gaming laptops that can cool a 100W chip.

Jingsing14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I think these articles get things a little out of perspective, Steam Deck has sold around 3 million and Switch has sold 140 million. But if you are browsing certain parts internet you'd think the Steam Deck had sold over 100 million. If articles are going to continue to circulate like this and continue to put the Steam Deck in the same arena then I'm comfortable calling the device a flop.

Neonridr14d ago

Steam Deck, while considerably more popular due to it's lower barrier of entry, is still a niche device with the likes of the ROG Ally and others.

I own one and it's really nice to be able to play some games on the go or in bed, but it'll never fully compete with a system like the Switch.

Skuletor14d ago

Especially when they're not in the same price range, the Switch is considerably cheaper.

gold_drake14d ago

sure but theres still a limit to what u can put in there ha. power consumption would be the biggest hurdle. and cooling.

Demetrius14d ago

I wana try out a pc handheld but I would like to experience a steady framerate etc I don't wana have to keep going into my settings trying to make things smoother in gameplay, that's the only thing that's been keepin me from getting one I've heard others having to go into the settings time from time that'll be annoying

270°

AMD gaming revenue declined massively year-over-year, CFO says the demand is 'weak'

Poor Xbox sales have affected AMD’S bottom line

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
RonsonPL29d ago

Oh wow. How surprising! Nvidia overpriced their RTX cards by +100% and AMD instead of offering real competition, decided to join Nvidia in their greedy approach, while not having the same mindshare as Nvidia (sadly) does. The 7900 launch was a marketing disaster. All the reviews were made while the card was not worth the money at all, they lowered the price a bit later on, but not only not enough but also too late and out of "free marketing" window coming along with the new card generation release. Then the geniuses at AMD axed the high-end SKUs with increased cache etc, cause "nobody will buy expensive cards to play games" while Nvidia laughed at them selling their 2000€ 4090s.
Intel had all the mindshare among PC enthusiasts with their CPUs. All it took was a competetive product and good price (Ryzen 7000 series and especially 7800x3d) and guess what? AMD regained the market share in DYI PCs in no time! The same could've have happened with Radeon 5000, Radeon 6000 and Radeon 7000.
But meh. Why bother. Let's cancell high-end RDNA 4 and use the TSMC wafers for AI and then let the clueless "analysts" make their articles about "gaming demand dwingling".

I'm sure low-end, very overpriced and barely faster if not slower RDNA4 will turn things around. It will have AI and RT! Two things nobody asked for, especially not gamers who'd like to use the PC for what's most exciting about PC gaming (VR, high framerate gaming, hi-res gaming).
8000 series will be slow, overpriced and marketed based on its much improved RT/AI... and it will flop badly.
And there will be no sane conclusions made at AMD about that. There will be just one, insane: Gaming is not worth catering to. Let's go into AI/RT instead, what could go wrong..."

Crows9029d ago

What would you say would be the correct pricing for new cards?

Very insightful post!

RonsonPL29d ago

That's a complicated question. Depends on what you mean. The pricing at the release date or the pricing planned ahead. They couldn't just suddenly end up in a situation where their existing stock of 6000 cards is suddenly unsellable, but if it was properly rolled out, the prices should be where they were while PC gaming industry was healthy. I recognize the arguments about inflation, higher power draw and PCB/BOM costs, more expensive wafers from TSMC etc. but still, PC gaming needs some sanity to exist and be healthy. Past few years were very unhealthy and dangerous to whole PC gaming. AMD should recognize this market is very good for them as they have advantage in software for gaming and other markets while attractive short term, may be just too difficult to compete at. AI is the modern day gold rush and Nvidia and Intel can easily out-spend AMD on R&D. Meanwhile gaming is tricky for newcomers and Nvidia doesn't seem to care that much about gaming anymore. So I would argue that it should be in AMDs interest to even sell some Radeon SKUs at zero profit, just to prevent the PC gaming from collapsing. Cards like 6400 and 6500 should never exist at their prices. This tier was traditionally "office only" and priced at 50$ in early 2000s. Then we have Radeons 7600 which is not really 6-tier card. Those were traditionally quite performant cards based on wider than 128-bit memory bus. Also 8GB is screaming "low end". So I'd say the 7600 should've been available at below 200$ (+taxes etc.) as soon as possible, at least for some cheaper SKUs.For faster cards, the situation is bad for AMD, because people spending like $400+ are usually fairly knowledgable and demanding. While personally I don't see any value in upscallers and RT for 400-700$ cards, the fact is that especially DLSS is a valuable feature for potential buyers. Therefore, even 7800 and 7900 cards should be significantly cheaper than they currently are. People knew what they were paying for when buying Radeon 9700, 9800, X800, 4870 etc. They were getting gaming experience truly unlike console or low-end PC gaming. By all means, let's have expensive AMD cards for even above $1000, but first, AMD needs to show value. Make the product attractive. PS5 consoles can be bought at 400$. If AMD offers just a slightly better upscalled image on the 400$ GPU, or their 900$ GPU cannot even push 3x as many fps compared to cheap consoles, the pricing acts like cancer on PC gaming. And poor old PC gaming can endure only so much.

MrCrimson29d ago

I appreciate your rant sir, but it has very little to do with gpus. It is the fact that the PS5 and Xbox are in end cycle before a refresh.

RonsonPL28d ago

Yes, but also no. AMD let their PC GPU marketshare to shrink by a lot (and accidentally helped the whole market shrink in general due to bad value of PC GPUs over the years) and while their console business may be important here, I'd still argue their profits from GPU division could've been much better if not for mismanagement.

bababooiy29d ago

This is something many have argued over the last few years when it comes to AMD. The days of them selling their cards at a slight discount while having a similar offering are over. Its not just a matter of poor drivers anymore, they are behind on everything.

RNTody28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Great post. I went for a Nvidia RTX 3060Ti which was insane value for money when I look at the fidelity and frame rates I can push in most games including new releases. Can't justify spending 3 times what my card cost at the time to get marginal better returns or the big sell of "ray tracing", which is a nice to have feature but hardly essential given what it costs to maintain.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
29d ago Replies(1)
KwietStorm_BLM29d ago

Well that's gonna happen when you don't really try. I want to support AMD so badly and give Nvidia some actual competition but they don't very much seem interested in challenging, by their own accord. I been waiting for them to attack the GPU segment the same way they took over CPU, but they just seem so content with handing Nvidia the market year after year, and it's happening again this year with their cancelled high end card.

MrCrimson29d ago

I think you're going to see almost zero interest from AMD or Nvidia on the gaming GPU market. They are all in on AI.

RhinoGamer8829d ago

No Executive bonuses then...right?

enkiduxiv29d ago

What are smoking? Got to layoff your way to those bonuses. Fire 500 employees right before Christmas. That should get you there.

Tapani29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Well, if you are 48% down in Q4 in your Gaming sector as they are, which in absolute money terms is north of 500M USD, then you are not likely to get at least your quarterly STI, but can be applicable for annual STI. The LTI may be something you are still eligible for, such as RSUs or other equity and benefits, especially if they are based on the company total result rather than your unit. All depends on your contract and AMD's reward system.

MrCrimson29d ago

Lisa Su took AMD from bankruptcy to one of the best semiconductor companies on the planet. AMD from 2 dollars a share to 147. She can take whatever she wants.

Tapani28d ago

You are not wrong about what she did for AMD and that is remarkable. However, MNCs' Rewards schemes do not work like "take whatever you want, because you performed well in the past".

darksky29d ago

AMD prcied their cards thinking that they will sell out just like in the mining craze. I suspect reality has hit home when they realized most gamers cannot afford to spend over $500 for a gpu.

Show all comments (33)
100°

Make your next GPU upgrade AMD as these latest-gen Radeon cards receive a special promotion

AMD has long been the best value option if you're looking for a new GPU. Now even their latest Radeon RX 7000 series is getting cheaper.

Father__Merrin39d ago

Best for the money is the Arc cards

just_looken39d ago

In the past yes but last gen amd has gotten cheaper and there new cards are on the horizon making 6k even cheaper.

The arc cards are no longer made by intel but asus/asrock has some the next line battlemage is coming out prices tbd.

Do to the longer software development its always best to go amd over intel if its not to much more money even though intel is a strong gpu i own 2/4 card versions.