1030°

Sony's silence on PlayStation VR could spell trouble for the fledgling market

Sony isn't really talking about VR and it recently killed a game studio behind one of its most popular VR titles. How should we interpret the company's silence, and what does it mean for the future of VR development?

Read Full Story >>
extremetech.com
Derceto2689d ago

VR is only appearing troubling now? For this reason? This thing was troubled from the get-go.

IamTylerDurden12689d ago

You're uninformed if you don't realize that PSVR has had manufacturing issues and thus was unavailable for months. Restocks are only just starting to come now. Sony pulled advertising this holiday and eased off the gas bc why would you advertise a product that ppl can't buy? It will ramp back up with RE7, Farpoint, Golem, AC7, Starblood Arena, Dirt Rally, GT Sport, ect.

SonyWarrior2689d ago

if farpoint is a hit PSVR will explode off the shelves its missing a game like that

bouzebbal2689d ago

It is true it was out of stock for a while, but I'll wait to see if it will pick at some point but I really don't think so. They haven't revealed a single game since e3 I believe

Nintendo4Lifex2689d ago

So regular titles that would hinder my gaming experience with awful vr. Yep seems legit.

freshslicepizza2689d ago

then why doesn't sony say its sold out and give numbers to how much they supplied?

_-EDMIX-_2689d ago

Agreed if anything I think people should wait for the next iteration on PS5.

VR is still a fairly new market. PlayStation VR is not going to single-handedly determine the failure or success of the medium....

For all we know Playstation VR2 will make much more sense than the first.

esmittystud1012689d ago

Let's be honost.......they only shove a few out at launch.......it drives demand up when they do that.

Example (unrelated):

When there is a flu shot shortage everyone wants one. When they have plenty around no one gives a sh*t.

dcbronco2689d ago

You don't stop advertising if a product has low availability during the holidays, many products aren't available. You stop if you're doing a relaunch later once you get games or if you've lost confidence in the product. Or given gaming is still Sony's biggest draw right now you don't want to waste money before you have games.

Kleptic2689d ago

@Tyler, as others mentioned...if that was the case Sony would be thumping their chest about it. Why advertise a device that people can't buy?...I can't tell if serious...Google has been pushing their pixel phones for nearly 5 months now, yet they've been out of stock more often than not. Hardware publishers/manufacturers don't 'ease off the gas' to quench demand when the problems are supply chain logistical. They ease off the gas when the marketing and advertising expenses aren't turning into revenues...

Nearly every review left testers underwhelmed...There are so many question marks surrounding the notion of 'will this work in the space i have available' that any informed consumer has pumped the brakes a bit. Sony's stance of going quite for the time being points back to the EXACT same situations surrounding Move. It's looking more and more like yet another mid-gen peripheral that get's thrown at the wall with the makers questioning if it'll stick just as much as the users. Happens nearly every gen.

2689d ago
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2689d ago
Erik73572689d ago

I laugh when I hear people call Switch gimmicky when we see this VR thing that so far is disastrous for gaming and only a fun tech demo.

MRMagoo1232689d ago

the whole switch console is a gimmick, psvr isn't mandatory and it's outsold the competitions vr on release calling that a disaster then praising Nintendo is only something a fool would do.

DeadlyOreo2689d ago

People don't call the Switch gimmicky. They call it downright garbage. VR is far from that.

OpinionSmasher2689d ago

If you bought psvr day 1 I'm sorry but that was stupid. No AAA game support and don't you dare say Rigs is a AAA game (p.s. that company closed the other day so theres that evidence). The only good game on PSVR is gonna be resident evil and even if that can get pushed by psvr if you thought you were gonna be able to do that on a base ps4 you are wrong. if you want a real VR experience you have to get a PS4 pro and the headset so basically 1000$. At that price they've overblown what the headset can do and at that price Oculus is a much more complete option. If anything fucking Gear VR is miles better than PSVR and thats running on a fucking phone and its 100$.

moegooner882689d ago

You don't have a clue about what you are saying, do you ?

OpinionSmasher2689d ago

the whole switch console is a gimmick????? Wow................just wow.

hirobrotagonist2689d ago

Yeah it'll be a fun tech demo when I'm playing Resident Evil 7 and Fallout 4 on my Vive with 90fps

Mrveryodd2689d ago

They will probably sell more psvr than the switch ... Lots of my friends are into vr ... Most likely porn I bet 😊.... None are into switch as they all have mobile devices that play games .... There thousand dollar phones

eferreira2689d ago

PSVR's launch lineup is bigger than Nintendo calendar year. Don't knock it till you try it. Also you're the one saying he rumble is revolutionary and better for games then vr

2689d ago
Kingcorey132689d ago

Well you obviously don't have one... it's been out for 3 months it has like 30 plus games.. every person who has played mine leaves my house amazed. It's a new way to play games.. there's nothing wrong with that... it's fun.. that's all that matters.

Aenea2689d ago

I rather play with PSVR than pretend to milk some cows 😜

FreeSpeech692689d ago

Compare 1 2 Switch with any AAA VR Game. Nintendo makes gimmicks, Sony makes Real Games.

rocketpanda2689d ago

VR is optional. The Switch is a core system. If PSVR, Occulus or Vive fails, you still have a system to play as usual.

If a console fails then you have nothing.

2689d ago
trooper_2689d ago

Lol, VR is gimmicky when it's sold a good amount of units?

You're funny.

Personally, I think this is another failed attempt to bash VR.

2689d ago
2689d ago
bouzebbal2689d ago

At least it's fun huh?
what's fun in doing matchmaking and getting a phone call at the same time?
Go to bed!

Kokyu2689d ago

Most of the launch date "games" on Switch are tech demos.

2689d ago
Uken122689d ago

Switch isn't a gimmick. Technically none of them are gimmicks, they become gimmicks when they aren't utilized. Switch will be utilized for what it is marketed as.
VR just isn't there yet and untrustworthy. A screen right in my eyes? I'm not sure I want that. Also there are moral aspects that come into play with people. The isolation from reality, how does effect peoples minds, emotions and social lives. VR truly is a different world so it will need time to be successful.
It isn't disastrous, nor a gimmick. just not there and not nearly as profitable for companies.

Why are people comparing VR to a console? Quit being illogical. Different things people. Quit using N4G to release your fanboy rage. See a therapist.

SharnOfTheDEAD2688d ago

This made me lol "I rather play with PSVR than pretend to milk some cows 😜"

PSVR has quite a lot of good games, Battlezone is fun, Rigs is fun, Rush of Blood, Batman etc Sure Sony closed down a studio but I can see why, you check out some game play for Rigs on youtube and it looks pretty dull which probably didn't help 1st impressions, I actually picked Battlezone over it, but when you're playing it, damn it's pretty awesome. VR is far from awful, people claiming that are just clutching at straws.

Gr8saiyaman882688d ago

Shhh! This is N4G, you can't talk bad about anything Sony is pushing or else you'll get downvoted : p

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 2688d ago
Artemidorus2689d ago

Funny because people on here disagreed with me when I said it's a gimmick that will be in the background by the end of 2017.

It's obivous it's not quite there

2689d ago
dillydadally2689d ago

Troubled? This article is moronic. They're not advertising because there's no stock to advertise. They sell every PSVR they put in the stores within 15 minutes. I've been trying to get one for 2 months now and I'm even on multiple stock alerts. On a sales front, PSVR is a raging success and this article is ridiculous. How can you do better than selling out 15 minutes after going in stock and why would you pour money into advertisements when there's nothing you can sell yet?

andibandit2689d ago

Huh? Didnt you already have a psvr, or are you tring to get a second pair?

81BX2689d ago

Cmon thats bs. I go onto gamestop i see adverts... i go into walmart and see the exact same thing.

2689d ago
Artemidorus2689d ago

Go eBay and pay the premium.

2689d ago
Ravenor2688d ago

My local bestbuy has the single headset not the bundle, they are out there. This isn't like finding a Wiimote in early 2007.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2688d ago
Number-Nine2689d ago

I bet all those that bought a VR now have dust settled on them. More useless hardware like the Move, Kinect, New 3DS, etc...

trooper_2689d ago (Edited 2689d ago )

I bet that a. You've never tried it and b. You're just like any other troll, harping on this poorly written article.

2689d ago Replies(5)
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2688d ago
theXtReMe12689d ago

I was just thinking of this the other day. Generally when Sony goes radio silent on something that they put their heart and soul into advertising, it isnt good news. I love their products, but it seems when they release something and it immediately doesnt hit their sales goals... they dont try new strategies in advertising or game design, they just drop the mic and walk away. Im hoping this isnt the case with their first foray into the VR market. As I think they could be on to something. The games just need to catch up to the tech. You cant expect people to pay $500+ on a new game system and have nothing but tech demos to play on it. Until they, and their third party developers, make full games that play every bit as well as console proper titles... VR is never going to take off.

I also think that the PS4 hardware just wasnt powerful enough to introduce it properly. Regardless of the new VR way to play, people generally dont want a step back in the games theyve been playing. VR was almost like turning the clock back to the early 90s and the 2D to 3D switch. Developers were essentially starting all over again from scratch, even though they really didnt need to. They could have just taken the games that fit best for the system and added VR. I understand that VR takes a bit of tweaking to get right, so people playing dont feel nauseous, but many developers said its as easy as keeping framerates steady and adding crosshairs or something stationary that gives players a constant focal point... Yet many developers took it to the extreme and basically said that regular games, like FPSs, would never work. Games like Farpoint are proving them wrong. Though, because the PC units have been out for quite some time and the PSVR closing in on 6 months with nothing but glorified tech demos... I believe many gamers already feel the dejavu of motion gaming all over again. A great idea that never gets fully realized.

The tech is perfect for racing, flight sim/combat and first person games. Lets just hope the market can hold on until full games release and show the true potential that VR could offer the future of gaming.

extermin8or2689d ago

PS3. PSP and PS vita all disagree with you.

gigoran2689d ago

hahaha

oh wait you were being serious. let me laugh even louder

HAHAHAHAHA

Mulando2689d ago

PS3 dead after PS4 release (expect for one racing game)
PSP dead after a few years (no more sony first party support)
Vita ... well same fate

DashArrivals2689d ago

I stopped reading after 3 lines. SONY actually hit their sales goals. In every single way in regards to PSVR. They don't announce numbers because they don't want the brand new tech to be a slave to them. This is different. VR IS NEW ok. This is the beginning.

CapitalGamerNZ2689d ago

Rubbish. Sony is the first to jump on the numbers bandwagon when they make for good reading. If PSVR had hit original sales estimates you would know about it. As it stands Sony have basically said they are happy with PSVR sales even though they revised down their estimate.

Sony did the same thing with Vita. Sales fell well below estimates so they started bundling sales numbers together the PSP to make for better reading.

I'm not saying PSVR will fail, its just waiting for its killer app, but when Sony goes quiet its for a reason and usually not one that suggests that numbers look good.

thejigisup2689d ago

I think they are trying to feel the market out, they know Nintendo switch and Scorpio are coming and want to be able to stand toe to toe with them. They need to have something new and fresh when the other two consoles launch. Reminding consumers that they can buy the psvr and add a whole new experience instead of a whole new console with few games or support, I think the timing of the launch was poor considering two new skus for the ps4 came around the same time. It was a misstep as far as timing goes but then staying quiet for now I think it's a great strategy.

kfk2689d ago

@CapitalGameNZ:
Where's your source on Sony 'revising down their estimate'? That didn't happen.

2689d ago
Aenea2689d ago

@capital

Sony never released their sales estimate to the public. The one that some articles have been written about was by some market research company...

ARESWARLORD2689d ago (Edited 2689d ago )

You should have read what he wrote it was pretty good and I do hope it's not true but when Sony does go silent on something it's usually not good he's right a hundred percent my beloved PS Vita can tell you that when's the last time you seen the first party game for that beautiful little system

TheCommentator2688d ago (Edited 2688d ago )

Hit their sales goals? Funny, they didn't rlease sales figures yet and rumors suggest that their goals were reduced to 750,000. Sony didn't release numbers for PS3 when it wasn't meeting expectations either, just like MS isn't concerned with them now. Difference here is that unlike a home console, PSVR appears to be going the same direction as any other device made under the PS brand.

Think about the excitement built up around Eye Toy, PS2 HDD, Move, PSP, VITA... and Sony has failed to support all of them. They copied the Wii and couldn't support it well enough to make it a success! Seriously though, where is the after launch support for VR? New title announcements? AAA games? Plus the tech is barely passable, and CES debuted much better 2nd gen headsets already with features like built in cameras for hand tracking.

Oh, and let's not forget that MS sold 8 million Kinects in 2 months and still failed, so sales do not always equal success.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2688d ago
dillydadally2689d ago

This is the exact opposite I think of what really happened. Every article that talks about the PSVR not meeting sales goals is moronic. How can it not meet their sales goals when every unit they put for sale is sold out within 15 minutes? I've been trying desperately to get a PSVR for 2 months now, including waking up at 3am to respond to in stock alerts, only to find out that it's out of stock by the time I can bring my phone to the website. Why would you pour a bunch of money into advertising something that you can't even keep in stock for 15 minutes? That would just frustrate people.

Petebloodyonion2689d ago

Gee where do you live?
I live In Canada and you can easily buy one online
Here's proof: http://www.bestbuy.ca/en-CA...

MatrixxGT2689d ago

Psvr has been available in US for a long while now. Only out of stock time was after intitial preorders and 1st retail shipments. After that you could buy one anytime you wanted, either bundled or stand alone.

Mulando2689d ago

I had never the problem to get one. Only in the release week, but that is normal for a new device. When launching a device, you don't want to deliver more, that get bought, so you always underdeliver and create some hype for the product.
Problem ist, normally sony give us the numbers, if they are proud about the result.

kneon2689d ago

@Petebloodyonion

it looks like they only have limited quantities, only one of the 25 closest stores to me had them in stock, Amazon only has them available from third parties at inflated prices, so supply is still tight.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2689d ago
uth112688d ago

How could PSVR not hit its sales goals when it sold out?

Selling every unit you were able to produce is failure now?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2688d ago
Gamist2dot02689d ago

I think they are silent because supply isn't meeting demand. If there are more supply than demand then that's when we'll see ads for it.

kfk2689d ago

This is the right answer. It's still sold out in a lot of markets, so it does more harm than good to advertise it when people can't get it; you end up wasting your marketing dollars just to frustrate consumers.

Despite the shortages, it's still outsold Oculus and Vive combined, and Resident Evil 7, the most AAA VR game yet, is coming out in five days and it's exclusive to PSVR for a year. There's no reason for concern yet.

dillydadally2689d ago

It's sold out EVERYWHERE. I've been trying to get one for 2 months straight.

Taero2689d ago

Love VR but just want to chime in that it isn't exclusive to PSVR for a year, it's exclusive to the PSVR for VR versions, the actual game is out on other platforms.

kfk2689d ago

@Taero: Yeah, that's what I meant.

fenome2689d ago

Probably, plus they're usually quiet anyways until they hit significant milestones. Once supply is meeting demand and they've sold X amount of units they'll be promoting it harder.

CapitalGamerNZ2689d ago

Supply cant meet demand so lets stop all marketing for the product?!? really?!? I would see that as a reason to fuel marketing and hype for a product, not to take your foot of the gas pedal. Keep demand high!!! Why let consumers potentially think that VR was a passing fad or a failure by just going quiet???

Rude-ro2689d ago

Probably a beta phase.
Brand new product, Sony wants to gather information. Since it is sold out, they are not concerned right now.
They want to collect data before ramping up production just incase there needs to be tweaks.

2689d ago
dillydadally2689d ago

This is exactly right, no matter what anyone else says. Anyone who doesn't think this is the case has not tried to get a PSVR. I've been trying for 2 months to get one now. I don't think people realize the demand for PSVR's right now. They sell out within 15 minutes every time any store gets them in stock. I'm on multiple stock alerts and get texts at 3 am telling me Amazon has restocked, only to find they are sold out by the time I can browse to Amazon on my phone. This is happening on every website. At least at this stage, PSVR couldn't possibly be more of a success.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2689d ago
Skankinruby2689d ago

I really hope this thing succeeds. It has so much potential it would be sad to see that go to waste and not get the appreciation it deserves

Kribwalker2689d ago

"When a company hides the real numbers it means huge problems." Corroios

IamTylerDurden12689d ago (Edited 2689d ago )

The difference is, Sony has had manufacturing issues and PSVR has basically been unavailable for months. Restocks are only just now starting back up. They pulled advertising bc the product wasn't available. Why would a company boast about sales when it hasn't really been able to sell anything since launch? Now, Microsoft simply hides numbers bc they've sold less than half of their biggest competitor and it would look bad.

Krib

It was sold out bc ppl wanted it but also bc Sony had problems manufacturing the RGB screens. Sony simply could not provide VR units bc of this. PS4s shortages were more bc of the ridiculous demand. It's very different. They just could not make PS4s fast enough, but with PSVR they just couldn't make them period.

Kribwalker2689d ago

If it was sold out everywhere (which Kaz has said "some retailers") then why wouldn't you trumpet the sales numbers? It never stopped them from trumpeting how many PS4s were sold in the early launch period when it was consistently sold out and had wait list to get the system at retailers

BlackTar1872689d ago

well krib launch of ps4 probably was in the millions of units made and on shelves.

Anyways you love this news. I'll look for your skeptic take when Scorpio has oculous.

CapitalGamerNZ2689d ago

"They pulled advertising bc the product wasn't available". This your view or did Sony announce they would stop marketing because of short supply???

Kribwalker2689d ago (Edited 2689d ago )

@blacktar

I'm not a VR fan, haven't been from the start. Don't like the idea of playing with a giant headset on when I spent over $3000on a big screen 4k tv and a high end home theatre system. So when oculus/Scorpio work together that won't really affect me

@tyler
This is the map of availability for PSVR in Canada at ebgames stores. Bestbuy also has them available
https://s30.postimg.org/4ao...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2689d ago
2689d ago Replies(2)
Lime1232688d ago

Exactly. Where are numbers for Xbox One, Kinect and Gears of War 4?

Show all comments (303)
300°

Days Gone Director Says Bend's Project Costs Over $250M; Says PS Co-CEO Doesn't Want 2 Zombies Games

Days Gone director claims Sony has already poured in at least a $250M in Bend's project; says Days Gone sold more than Death Stranding.

shinoff218321h ago

Well that sucks. Seems they want more online trash. I'd rather of had the sequel if it was single player

MrNinosan7h ago

What online trash games did PS Studios release last 10 years?

Notellin5h ago

The past has nothing to do with the future. This is such a terrible argument. Everyone knows about their current live service push.

_SilverHawk_4h ago

It's so tragic what happened to days gone. It is such an amazing game but bandwagoners trashed it and it underperformed in it's launch year. Days gone is the best open world zombie game released in the past five years. I was recently playing it on pc and I'm still amazed by it.

Games are very expensive to make and it seems like it's normal for a AAA game to cost over a quarter billion to make so if a quality game like days gone greatly underperforms then people shouldn't be upset when they see a lot of GAAS. I still remember a lot of bandwagoners calling days gone trash but years later it's now amazing when it's considered a failure by sony.

If a game isn't the best thing seen since hats with pockets then a lot of gamers who haven't played it automatically calls it rubbish and whoever made it should be incarcerated

Cacabunga2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Co CEO prefers gamers to boycott.. so be it. I’ll never buy a gaas.
Just imagine buying a game you cannot replay in some years.. this shit must stop.

Days Gone did zombies in a very original way. The story was also so engaging. You actually only meet Zombie hordes later in the game. There are many more enemy groups to deal with.

MrNinosan1h ago

@Notelin
I am one of the few who bought Days Gone on release day and loved it completely.
However, "more online trash" is phrased like Sony has put out alot of trash online games.
We got what, 2 games? Helldivers 2 and GT7, 2 of the most sold Playstation games where both is loved by millions.

You, me and especially shinoff has no idea if Fairgames, Marathon and Concord will be trash.

Just because we (as in you and me) don't love or support online games, doesn't mean millions of other do.

And we don't know what Bend Studio is working with? We don't know if they're forced to make a online game or another amazing single player experience.

The only thing we do know is that it's not Days Gone, sadly due to poor sales the first 6 months.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
-Foxtrot21h ago

It would be a shame if it was true that Hermen never gave the franchise a chance simply because he didn't like it and they already had a "Zombie" game with TLOU.

NaughtyDog are most likely moving onto a new IP next so it would have been the perfect time to do it.

ThinkThink13h ago

Here's where xbox steps in and releases state of decay 3 day and date on ps5.

Grilla6h ago

Days gone 2 was canceled before Herman was in charge. That happened like 4 years ago.

vfl5236h ago

4 years ago he was head of Playstation Studios. He would've probably had a hand in the cancelation.

Notellin5h ago

Man two seconds of research could have saved you from this comment. Amazing work Grilla you fit in with the uniformed N4G community who speaks before verifying anything that they say.

Redemption-643h ago

Maybe encourage people to buy the game at full price and not when it's heavily discounted or go on plus. If this game had sold well when it was full priced a sequel would have been in the works. They made a single-player game that most people didn't support until they dropped the price.

Cacabunga2h ago

The guy’s just a moron.. he should have stayed within game development. His choices will have a terrible impact on the brand in the long run.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
excaliburps7h ago

Yep. Kind of weird since it wasn't a sales flop, no?

I know we have to take what Ross says with a grain of salt since we're hearing just one side of the story, but even so, the game wasn't bad at all. Heck, it's my brother's favorite last-gen game from what I recall.

The amount of zombies on screen, imagine that with the PS5 and SSD? That would be insanely fun!

Grilla6h ago

Most copies were sold on sale. Not enough ppl bought it at full price. I paid 20$ for it 6 -7 months after release.

Notellin5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Yeah we should never believe the creators side until we hear the corporate/big business side as history has shown we should always believe billion dollar corporations.

What a bootlicker statement.

derek45m ago

@Notellin, of course you'll believe an embittered ex-employee with an axe to grind because it's evil Sony he's complaining about. You guys act like days gone was this huge success and somehow Sony hates easy money a sequel would have generated. The game was mid and so was the response to it. They're still supporting the developer who is making a new ip that could be great.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 45m ago
P_Bomb7h ago

Well I don’t want 10 live service games, but they have no problem doing that lol. Ugh.

CrimsonWing696h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Oh great so we only get what the big wigs want… y’know, the people that really have their fingers on the pulse of what their consumers want. Faaaaantastic!

rippermcrip3h ago

Well consider they know the sales... they do know what the consumer wants.

It sold shit.

Show all comments (42)
260°

Trying to push players over from PC to console is a terrible idea, PlayStation

As PlayStation announces its new strategy to encourage PC users to choose PS5 it is a bitter-sweet moment for PC gamers.

Christopher23h ago

I mean, it's a business based on hardware market. Do we expect them to not even try? It's not like Nintendo doesn't do the same by not putting any games on PC and Microsoft until recently did the same. I don't care what they attempt, as long as they don't abuse the community or lie about their goals/requirements.

Will it work? Not likely. Should we care? No. Let them waste their time, it doesn't affect anything.

RaidenBlack22h ago

let them try ... at the end of the day, we get few extra PC games ... yay ... and also promotes game preservation via PC ... so double yay.

LordoftheCritics6h ago

If only Playstation games provided the ease of pc gaming features.

Primary being very few PS games support m/kb.

Fishy Fingers21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

I wish them the best of luck.

But PC players are often a patient bunch, many will even wait for Epic launcher exclusivity to end until a game comes to Steam.

If they didnt buy the console when its games were exclusive, why would they do it now theyre not?

MrNinosan7h ago

Way more do than you probably think.

ravens527h ago

All you need is that one game that'll make a few switch at a time. Like a game a PC player REALLY wants.

outsider16244h ago

I mean if there's 10 million pc gamers out there...getting atleast just 1 million from there is probably a good thing..right?

romulus231h ago

PC players are not a monolith, I don't know why people keep thinking they speak for the entirety of all PC gamers like they all know each other personally. You think out of the millions of PC gamers not one single person will be impatient?Well Sony is willing to bet there will be. Why would they do it now? People's feelings change and new PC gamers come along all the time that may also feel different about waiting, that's why.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
-Foxtrot21h ago

PC gamers are just too patient and loyal to their gaming set ups, something they've spent a lot of money on to perfect. They have backlogs of games which many never get round to finishing or get round to at all and will always have other multiplatform releases to keep them going.

Over the many years Sony has published so many awesome titles such as The Last of Us, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Infamous, Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, Dreams, Puppeteer, Resistance, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo, Motor Storm, God of War, Horizon, Ratchet and Clank, Spiderman, Ghost of Tsushima, Bloodborne

If none of those games BEFORE all these PC ports convinced a hardcore PC gamer to get a PS5 console then why on Earth would porting them them to PC now make any difference? All PC gamers now know 100% is that they just have to be patient, which they are good at anyway to get a PS5 game 2 years later.

I get GaaS games or multiplayer focused titles but if people really want to play these games they'd have gotten a PS console years ago.

Crows904h ago

Not sure they're aiming to convince the hardcore PC gamer.

Not sure why people are obsessing over his comment...it seems pretty simple to me.

He will do all he can to entice gamers to move to his ecosystem. As you say....exclusives existing hasn't moved many gamers over. But if they get to try them and love the games then they might change their mind about waiting 2 years.

We're in an echo chamber on this site...I've Personally seen people with Xbox and PC setups but no PlayStation. I've also seen people with small PC setups but no console. Not every pc gamer invests thousands and many may decide to put one in the living room.

They're not looking to convince all of players to buy a PlayStation...just a few...and really it is just a PR statement after all...they have to give a reason why single player won't release day 1....not to mention they also have to ensure current PlayStation gamers don't jump ship to PC. It goes both ways and they're ignoring the big L by putting any of their games off their platform.

anast3h ago

"Not sure they're aiming to convince the hardcore PC gamer."

Right here

Kakashi Hatake4h ago

PC gamers think tomorrow is promised. Sorry, don't have time for that.

Michiel19893h ago

it's not just about loyalty or sunk cost, pc is an open platform while consoles are closed platforms. If you for example want to mod, you will play on pc, no question about it. Also if you like indie games, steam is a fucking goldmine for that. I've been playing a lot of indie games over the last years and there just seems to be an endless amount of them on steam. Also not having games locked to a certain fps is a prettty big deal for me and I assume a lot of other pc players.

Walalon1h ago

And don't forget steam sales, you can get a ton of games on an awesome price.

romulus231h ago

And how do you know out of the millions of PC gamers that not one single person ever went ahead and bought a PlayStation console for one or more of those games? People keep speaking for the entirety of millions of PC gamers like they know them all personally. Here's one example for you, I'm currently typing on a recently purchased PC that cost me over twenty five hundred dollars and is more than capable of running any game including Sony exclusives that come to PC and yet I still bought a PS5 so apparently I'm not patient or loyal enough to my set up, hope it's not mad at me for not being loyal.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
helicoptergirl21h ago

Who cares? Then just stay on PC and play the waiting game. No big deal. Sony wins in the end anyway.

Number1TailzFan21h ago

I mean if there's any single player Sony games that I actually want that aren't on PC then I would buy said console to play them on. But the ones that I like that aren't on PC are few and far between anyway so no loss for me.

If I game, it's usually multiplayer titles, otherwise I like playing around with some other software.

Show all comments (40)
60°

Greetings from the newly minted CEO - Shams Jorjani

Operating under the username BigKahuna_AGS, Jorjani created a lengthy thread on the Helldivers subreddit to introduce himself to the community following his appointment as CEO in early May.