990°

New Sucker Punch PS4 game is a new IP

It looks as if the new long-in-development PS4 title from inFAMOUS developer Sucker Punch Productions is in fact a new IP, that is according to known industry insider Shinobi602.

-Foxtrot2698d ago

Ah awesome

Was hoping for inFAMOUS 3 (maybe something with Cole to wrap it up as a trilogy) but a new IP sounds awesome

Abash2698d ago

Another inFamous is still possible someday, but it is all they have done since moving on from Sly Cooper. I'm really excited hearing its a new IP, I love Sly and inFamous so I cant wait to see their next new series

bouzebbal2698d ago

Awesome stuff.. Looking forward to this. Probably at e3. I love this developer I platinumed every single game they made.

naruga2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

@ Foxtrot are u serious?? inFamous was mediocre generally (not technically bad but generic , uninspired and boring to play, completely forgetable ) ... its good that they didnt continued the IP instead invested their resources to smthing new ....i wonder what genre will be the new game and if it manages to attract my interest

nveenio2698d ago

Infamous 1 and 2 are still my only Platinumed games. If it wasn't for a change in my lifestyle, I would have done the same with Second Son. I love those games.

DARKKENT2698d ago

E3 cannot come quick enough

Deadpooled2697d ago

naruga receiving a well deserved 72 disagrees to a mere 2 agrees, want to see "not technically bad but generic , uninspired and boring to play, completely forgetable"? go back to Quantum Broken and Ryse.

Drizzy2697d ago

New ip's are cool. Just hope it's not another shooter. I love Infamous one of my favorite series so here's me hoping they make Infamous 3

SmielmaN2697d ago

@naruga.
Gotta disagree there. Infamous series is one of the best on Sony, imo. I could replay that game for hours. I don't typically return to hunt for wverything in a game when I'm done unless its really enjoyable to me. And infamous games had me hooked.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2697d ago
PhoenixUp2698d ago

Cole's story is already over

-Foxtrot2698d ago

I don't know that lightning bolt in the form of a question mark wouldn't be put their for no reason

I like to think Second Son will go off the Evil ending

Delsin is shown to be the real Beast...John being just an outcome of the timeline being changed

Cole is revived to face his Destiny

Trilogy over and we got a good Beast Origin story with Second Son

Darkfist_Flames2698d ago

but Delsin isnt, i want him to lose all his power except smoke and fight powerful conduits.

PhoenixUp2698d ago

Second Son canonically goes with the ending that Cole is dead, but there are still Conduits about.

inFamous at this point has grown past Cole and just demonstrates how different type of people morally adapt to the superpowers they receive

ShadowWolf7122698d ago

One game with a protagonist nowhere near as liked or well-received as Cole does not in any way indicate the franchise has "grown beyond" him.

And honestly, after the way 2 ended, with that bolt... that stuff doesn't happen for no reason. He'll be back.

PhoenixUp2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

You forget the other game, First Light.

They already went with the ending of Cole dying. There's really no reason to continue the story from there

IamTylerDurden12697d ago

Cole is done, but if anything i'd love to play as Kessler in an alternate dystopian future where u recruit two other conduits to help u take on the beast (perhaps Deslin as the beast) and the game would feature 3 player co op.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2697d ago
ziggurcat2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

"... maybe something with Cole to wrap it up as a trilogy..."

uh... they killed off cole at the end of 2... they even reference him in second son in the past tense as though he was dead.

Inzo2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

Not really, SPP left the door open for a return in both Hero and Evil endings.

ziggurcat2698d ago

At any rate, it says it's a new IP, so that right there is enough to tell you it's not a new infamous game.

Why o why2698d ago

You know what, for a second I tought aint they doing the spiderman game.....can they handle 2 big new ips then I remembered it was insomniac that have been given the opportunity to try their hand at an openworld hero game. Sony aint playing this gen. They are going for the jugulars

-Foxtrot2698d ago

I really wish they were given X-Men to do...they'd nail it.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

@Why o why Insomniac is working on the new Spiderman game not SP.

Ceaser98573612697d ago

Asuna
"Insomniac is working on the new Spiderman game not SP"

Hey there, Good morning .. Where have you been all this time. :D

_-EDMIX-_2698d ago

Definitely I'm happy to hear that they're starting a new intellectual property though because it was always hard for me to get into the infamous series.

Don't get me wrong I beat the first game and really liked it I just never really started the second game and a little while ago finished the third with Second Son.

I think another team would probably do fine with Infamous if they get tied up in their new intellectual property.

I mean we still got a Sly Cooper 4

badz1492698d ago

Sly 4 wasn't developed by them though. It was Sanzaru Games but the last I heard about them, Sony isn't tying them to anything 1st party related anymore.

_-EDMIX-_2698d ago

@bad- trust me, I know.

As to why I stated

"I think another team would probably do fine with Infamous if they get tied up in their new intellectual property.

I mean we still got a Sly Cooper 4"

That statement was simply saying that another team would do fine with Infamous simply because another team did pretty good with Sly 4.

I follow the industry pretty closely (too closely lol)

gangsta_red2698d ago

I always wanted Cole to comeback and actually build a team of metas sort of like the Justice League and then fight against other villains with powers.

Silly gameAr2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

That would actually be pretty awesome. Co op play would would work with a team of conduits , where you can actually play as the other conduits instead of just borrowing their powers like in Infamous 2.

Tussin1872698d ago

This is what I like about Sony's 1st party studios. They are now starting/have been producing 2 different IPs per studio. That's how you do it. I have absolutely no clue what they could be working on. I really love the Infamous series and I'm sure whatever they show will be amazing. What they accomplished so close to the PS4 launch was insane.

Imagine what they can do now. And with the PRO on top of that!!!! MIND BLOWN!!! Can't wait.

starchild2698d ago

Yeah, this is music to my ears. I really enjoyed Infamous Second Son and the spin off First Light, but new IPs are always exciting. Looking forward to seeing what it is.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2697d ago
MasterOfThe12Blades2698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

Too bad...I really enjoyed the infamous series

G20WLY2698d ago

This doesn't mean it's over for infamous.

Ceaser98573612697d ago

Hows it bad?? At least SP is doing something new now. Aint that Great.

DigitalRaptor2698d ago

It's going to be a huge E3 this year.

I think Sucker Punch game reveal with either open or close the show.

Ceaser98573612698d ago (Edited 2698d ago )

GOW gameplay will open the show and The Last of us 2 gameplay will close the show.. :)

SaveFerris2698d ago

Nice. I can't wait to see what they have been working on. GG with a new IP, and now Sucker Punch. It seems like Sony is letting the studios try something new for this gen.

2698d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (114)
100°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot072d ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda1d 21h ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff21831d 11h ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6381d 10h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda1d 9h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 20h ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

220°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning772d ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv722d ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC2d ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno2d ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier2d ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

romulus231d 17h ago

Stockholm syndrome, maybe?

BlindMango1d 12h ago

The reason they would need to "partner with Microsoft" is simply to make a game that's part of a franchise that Microsoft owns. Meaning they're probably going to make a new Spyro game - they're still an independent studio, but are making a game in a franchise that Microsoft owns. It's kind of like Remedy partnering with Rockstar to be able to make the Max Payne remakes.

shinoff21831d 11h ago

It was probably the deal to get released from Ms

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 11h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier2d ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

PhillyDonJawn1d 17h ago

No, I'm sure MS can and does step in when they want something done specifically but I'm also sure they let them also work independently

shinoff21831d 11h ago

I highly highly doubt this. Ms controls all. The guys aren't gonna be allowed to just shut something down like that without approval. No way

Elda2d ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer1d 23h ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Don't worry about my comments.

PhillyDonJawn1d 17h ago

Right probably something like astrobot

romulus231d 17h ago

Nah he said "uninteresting", lots of people are interested in Astro Bot.

Elda1d 15h ago

Never Astro Bot. Astro Bot looks better than any exclusive released on XB this entire generation & believe there hasn't been much.

Asplundh1d 14h ago

Crash 4 was good, so I'm hopeful.

PhillyDonJawn1d 13h ago

Hey you said that about SOT and looks like many ppl on PS is playing it. You also found bugsnax interesting ffs your opinion hold no weight lol.

Elda1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Bugsnax is BS, tried it & quickly deleted it. It's a game that fits right on Gamepass. PS5 owners that are probably playing the boring SOT you could count on one hand. LMAO!!...don't try to come for me.

PhillyDonJawn1d 10h ago

So you admit bugsnax interested you enough to try? 😂 someone gotta call you out on the foolishness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 10h ago
Show all comments (35)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein3d ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff21832d ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear212d ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha2d ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy012d ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (16)