120°

Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary 17 Brand New Screens

Have a look at these stunning 17 brand new screens of Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary that Microsoft have released today.

Read Full Story >>
genuinegamers.com
BiggCMan4659d ago

I don't think they did this remake right. Halo was so great the way it was, and then they went and added stuff from the new game. Armor Abilities, maps, and some other stuff. I love the graphics of course, but it's not the original Combat Evolved anymore once they decided to do all of that stuff. And Kinect support I believe they added as well if i'm not mistaken, but correct me if i'm wrong on that. That's just stupid.

Blaze9294659d ago

they did the 'single-player' right...but they shouldn't have touched the multiplayer besides the visual updates and adding Xbox LIVE

MerkinMax4659d ago

I'm just going to clarify for everyone real quick. Campaign is just new graphics on top of the old code so gameplay has not changed. In multiplayer, the new Title Update will allow them to tweak aspects of Reach to recreate the classic Halo 1 multiplayer feel. They will have Anninversary specific playlists that will include the 3 shot pistol, removal of armor abilities. removal of bloom and other changes to bring back the Halo 1 feel. They will also have modified versions of the classics maps with tweaked Reach gameplay mechanics. So if you like Reach the way it is, the original Reach playlists will be there. If you want that old Halo 1 feel, then those playlists will be there too.

Gray-Fox-Type04659d ago

the single player is exactly the same as the orginal with updated graphics.

the multiplayer is not from Halo CE infact its Halo reach multiplayer with new maps which are remakes from the Halo CE maps.

They did it right don't know what your talking about really. Multiplayer probably couldn't because all the old net code and stuff and time restraints.

Think of it as Halo 3 ODST it had the Halo 3 multiplayer disc.

Same as this one.

BiggCMan4659d ago

Then it is not Combat Evolved anymore like I said. It's great that the story is there, but the biggest part is completely changed around, and not like the classic game. I'm sorry if you feel differently and are happy with this, but i'm not. I'd much prefer if they just made the graphics better and added LIVE gameplay. There is only a few maps from CE in this, the rest are from reach, and there is armor abilities etc.. That is fine for Reach, I loved the game. But this is practically releasing the same game, and it's stupid.

Gray-Fox-Type04659d ago

oh in that case..i agree the multiplayer was great! and its a huge part missing in this case it does mean its incomplete, i was referring to the campaign mostly. I am not even getting this lol i already have the game so ill give it a pass and wait for Halo 4. might rent it though. I am not buying the same game haha

BlackKnight4659d ago

@BiggCMan

So the Splinter Cell Collection for the PS3 is not Splinter cell then because it has NO MP AT ALL right?

At least you get MP that has refreshed maps (new content) and has the game settings changed (no armor abilities, etc) and the pistol back with its 3 headshots glory.

otherZinc4659d ago

All of you guys are wrong. You guys should listen to the Halo Fest panel.

You can press a button that will give you exactly what Halo:CE was 10years ago.
There is a mode in multiplayer where you can go back to Halo:CE 10years ago.
The Halo:CE maps have a button to accommodate the load-outs from Reach: however, you dont have to play that way.
The Anniversary Remake will also open new tunnels (If you like) with the press of a button to accommodate the features of the various load-outs from Halo:Reach.

See, if you want to play "exactly" the way Halo:CE played 10years ago, you can. However, there are only about 5 of the 7 maps from Halo:CE I believe. There will be 1 PC map & 1 or 2 Halo:2 maps, I think.

The games going to be absolutely marvelous, I dont see what the problem is. Also, it should be the blueprint of how remakes "should" be done: with the old & very new added in.

Jocosta4659d ago

Did they make it to where I can play with updated graphics but no load-outs?

fossilfern4659d ago

The best Halo now redone with the option to go back 10 years :D ! Loved Halo CE

towelie12884659d ago

cant wait loved halo CE and these remastered maps look amazing
plus i believe in the classic playlist there wont be any AA's

ahhhhh and the halo CE pistol is back!!!!!

Dread4659d ago

Can't wait

day one for me :)

happy gaming for the fans...the haters can suck it

Vega754659d ago

At first I wasn't interested in re-buy the first halo since I already own the first on on xbox and it still plays in my 360. But since they added the feature to switch between the remastered version and the classic version. I could not resist not getting it Can't wait

150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies7d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX7d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody7d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

rob-GP3d ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic "They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo..."

lol, you mean:

NES, SNES
GameBoy, GameBoy Advanced, GameBoy Colour, GameBoy SP
DS, DSi, DSXL
3DS, 3DS XL, New 3DS, New 3DS XL
Wii, Wii U
Switch, Switch OLED

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Cacabunga7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_7d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga7d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie5d ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly7d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga7d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit7d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_7d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21837d ago (Edited 7d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies7d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (31)
150°

Microsoft to Add Copilot AI to Video Games

Microsoft recently revealed its plans to incorporate Copilot directly into video games, with Minecraft being the first showcased example.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Fishy Fingers12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

F*** AI

"Hey Copilot, what's a good meme to prove I dislike AI".... https://giphy.com/clips/sou...

Einhander197212d ago

Two trillion dollar company that just can't wait to put as many people possible out of work as fast as possible.

It feels like every single thing they do is making gaming worse and destroying the industry.

12d ago
12d ago
12d ago
darthv7211d ago

....you know it takes people to program the AI.... right? It isnt like it is sentient. We haven't reach skynet level of situation or anywhere close to the matrix just yet.

That's next Thursday.

Einhander197210d ago (Edited 10d ago )

It takes a people to program the AI then that AI is used for who knows how many games eliminating countless jobs which only grows as AI is used for more and more game creation functions.

What you're saying is so ridiculously short sighted and truly larking any kind of understanding and foresight.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
CaptainFaisal11d ago

Why all the hate? Im actually excited about this! Always wanted this kind of immersion, and an AI companion with me all the time helping me out knowing the status of my skills/inventory/progress and giving me tips on the best approach or how to craft something specific is game changing for the industry.

Hate all you want about AI, but this is just the start and I can see the potential already. You wont be complaining in the next 5-10 years about this, but rather complain if a game hasn’t implemented it.

MrDead11d ago

Yes we can't wait for the work of others to be used without the need to pay them so that MS can profit even more from the people they fire.

I_am_Batman11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

There is no chance I'd ever use something like this, especially if it's not part of the core game design, but a layer on top of it. It's way too much handholding. Many games already feel like busy work, because they don't let the player figure things out on their own. Having a real-time interactive guide defeats the purpose of playing the game in the first place in my opinion.

If this were to become the standard like you predict, we'll see more and more video games get away with bad design, because people will just be used to ask for help from the AI companion anyway.

Number1TailzFan11d ago

Well Nintendo don't need this with some of their games these days, with invincible characters, items, easy bosses etc.. they do the hand holding built in

helicoptergirl11d ago

Takes "hand holding" in games to a whole new level.

BlackDoomAx10d ago

Because human nature xD Almost every new technology had these kind of comments.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
Show all comments (19)
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Psychonaut8515d ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.