380°

The PS4 Doesn't Need Just PlayStation Now, it Needs PS1 Classics

Sony capitalized on a combination of nostalgia and historical preservation with its PSP, PS3 and Vita generation of hardware. The whole process made buying and playing old classics easy and affordable, and often gave Nintendo's own Virtual Console a run for its money.

The PS4 has virtually none of that, and by ignoring its line of classic games, it's leaving money on the table. What the PS4 currently has are compromises; half-steps that give the illusion of a celebration of its history but are effectively hamstrung by their own implementation.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
naruga2670d ago (Edited 2670d ago )

totally agree we need an emulation for pS1/2 discs now! ....its a huge con for pS4 not not support the whole legendary library of predecessors and instead relying on asubscription service ...i said it even before its release , PS Now will be a failure

spaceb0y2669d ago

Guess what...Microsoft is developing it's own version called Arcadia game streaming. Unlike you, corporations know the importance of having a game streaming service.

LexHazard792669d ago

Its not only for games, it will do it for apps as well. So its different already.

I-wear-clothes2669d ago (Edited 2669d ago )

Why are you bringing microsoft into this?

jrshankill2669d ago

A quick search of "Microsoft Arcadia" shows the latest news of this was in 2014.

Try again, fanboy

Kleptic2669d ago

wait serious question; if you purchased digital PS1 classics on the PSN with the PS3...you can't play them on the PS4?

Isn't that what Nintendo did with their store thing? Or is all this about PS1/PS2 discs not working in the PS4?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2669d ago
Perjoss2669d ago

BC is a cool feature but I have never desired to have it on ps4, there are just too many other good games coming out all the time to be playing old stuff.

MRMagoo1232669d ago

I agree , I'm only 4 days away from buying my ps4 pro and not once have I thought to myself 'I hope I can play my ps1 and ps2 games on it' when I feel like playing them I move over to my ps2 and turn it on and put a disc in (usually one of my final fantasy games)

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

Agreed the only game from last generation that I'm looking to replay in the near future is Mass Effect 2 and 3

But I actually have a PlayStation 3 for that so I just find the inclusion of it on future platforms just not that relevant if you consider the platforms before we're not just banished into Oblivion they still exist and are functional.

RosweeSon2669d ago

Yeah Has to have some use... ps1 classics... they should add ps2 classics there as well but some games need the extras buttons ;(

WickedLester2669d ago (Edited 2669d ago )

Agreed. I didn't buy PS4 to be a retro machine. I bought it to play new games. BC is a nice added bonus but I'm certainly not sitting around wringing my hands over not having it. If you care that much about retro gaming, go buy a Rasberry Pi and play all the old stuff you want.

Espangerish2669d ago (Edited 2669d ago )

I agree up to a point. BC for PS3 games on PS4 would be awesome. PS2, PS1 is a bit too far back for me. Those games are best left in the memory...

NapalmSanctuary2669d ago

Assuming the consumer doesn't have particular tastes and just consumes everything that is put in front of them. Whats good is subjective. I for instance, have played more retro games this gen because I can count the number of games from this gen, that I liked, on both hands. I don't expect Sony to think everyone is like me, cause they're not. They sure as hell shouldn't expect everyone to be like you, cause they're not.

ONESHOTV22668d ago

_-EDMIX-_---- but you know what would have been nice ? playing those two game at the frames and res they were meant to be played isnt that a good reason

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2668d ago
_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

??

a subscription service is actually simply just an option , it was not made instead of because that same Subscription Service actually works on PlayStation 3 A system that actually has backwards compatibility to PlayStation one...

ShadowKnight2669d ago (Edited 2669d ago )

Ummm PS4 is already successful without BC. It Wouldn't hurt to add PS1 classics to PS now

-Foxtrot2669d ago

I want my PS1 Classics that I bought on the PS3

I spent a lot of money on them thinking they would ALWAYS be in my account and I could redownload them again on my new console

Years later and the only PS1 game I've seen on there is FFVII but it's the PC Port.

callahan092669d ago

I'm actually kind of angry that my PS1 classics that I bought when I had a PS3 are not available to download/play on my PS4. It's pretty stupid, if you ask me. Major missed opportunity.

zaherdab2669d ago

@Kleptic ... not exactly these games are not supported altogether on the ps4 ... you can repurchase a ps4 compatible version.

If they decide to make them available on ps4 and push people to buy them again ... then yea that would be similar... it's kind of what they did with ps2 classics, they modified them a bit and added trophy support and made people rebuy them.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2668d ago
DeadSilence2670d ago

We need Ps1 classics with Trophies, Ps2 classics are amazing but Ps1 oh boy!

2669d ago
ApocalypseShadow2670d ago (Edited 2670d ago )

Consumers blame Sony for the lack of BC support when they should be looking in the mirror and at the economic collapse as the reason they couldn't afford PS3.360 launched in 2005 and consumers had no problem paying $299-$399 then(NO BC). Or paying these prices for accessories with some being way overpriced:

Faceplate ($19.99)• Hard Drive (20 GB) ($99.99) • Memory Unit (64 MB) ($39.99) • Wireless Networking Adapter ($99.99) • Wireless Controller ($49.99)• Play and Charge Kit ($19.99) • Rechargeable Battery Pack ($11.99)• Controller ($39.99) • Headset ($19.99) • Universal Media Remote ($29.99)• Component HD AV Cable ($39.99)• S-Video AV Cable (US) ($29.99)• SCART AV Cable (Europe) (24.99) • VGA HD AV Cable ($39.99)

PS3 dropped in Nov of 2006 and the world economy collapsed in 2007. Sony built a powerful system that played almost every PS1 and PS2 game. And the result was consumers, with a new mindset of buying cheaper products, shunned PS3 as being too expensive. Complaining about $599 US dollars when there was a $499 version. But that was too much.

To lower the price, Sony takes out the components for BC and other features, and consumers complained they weren't getting the fat PS3 for less when Sony was already taking a hit of $200 to get it in consumers hands. Consumers and developers told Sony *NO* on the Cell and the price so, this gen Sony went with a balance of power and chip set developers liked and a price consumers could afford.and since they sold millions upon millions of PS3's without full BC, Sony concluded consumers can live without it.

And , since PS4 is *dropping games* like Muhammad Ali and B-10s dropped bombs, there really isn't that much a need for BC.I could see if PS4 didn't have any games. But it almost has too many games creating back catalogs.I like BC, but if it matters that much, buy a PS1 or PS2. And PS now isn't BC. It's a streaming service that's also on **PC**. And there are over 450 games offered. And it's not Sony's fault for your internet being slow.

Anyway, since Sony has sold near 60 million PS4's without it, it doesn't seem to be a priority to them or to gamers. Enjoy all the ridiculous amount of new games and be happy. But the economy and consumers changed Sony's mindset. And we all benefited from it. Why look back when you can look ahead. When FFVII,GT,GOW, Detroit, Persona5, TLofU2, Shenmue, ace combat 7,Tekken7, Death Stranding, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc and fricken setera, you'll forget all about BC. And you got free games you can download and Indies to keep you company. All bran new.

freshslicepizza2669d ago

@Apocalypse Shadow
" Enjoy all the ridiculous amount of new games and be happy."

wow, talk about commitment. once again you have proven time and again you are willing to go that extra mile to defend things that dont need defending.

MRMagoo1232669d ago

and once again you have proven to not have the ability to bring anything relevant or important to the conversation /slowclap

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

I'm sorry but I'm going to have to agree with him on this one there's so many games that are releasing for this generation that I find it difficult to be complaining about backwards compatibility unless you're on a platform that is receiving no games and you're only enjoyment is playing the previous generations which makes me question why on Earth would someone purchase a new generation platform only to rely on playing last Generations games....

I'm sorry but I have no interest in owning a platform that is so desolate of games that the only Solace is playing last Generations games.

As of right now I just finished up Resident Evil 7, I'm currently playing Yakuza 0, I'm going to be purchasing Ni Ho, I'm going to be also purchasing Horizon zero Dawn on top of Mass Effect 3 on top of Persona 5 on top of Gravity Rush 2 on top of Kingdom Hearts 2.8 ......

How much time do you seriously think I have to go back to a previous generation? I'm contemplating in seeing if I even have the time to squeeze in a replay of Mass Effect 3 before Andromeda and I'm just now seeing if it's even possible before it's inevitable release.

I have a backlog of games from this generation that I've yet to finish, like blood-borne end The Witcher 3 I also wanted to play the Order 1886 and a few other games

Yet were talking about Last Generation games? I'm trying to catch up that this generation games I just don't really see me having that much time for that.

In the future I actually only see me replaying Red Dead Redemption Mass Effect 3 Deus Ex human Revolution...

But I actually still own a PC and a PlayStation 3 for that so that's not really that big of a deal for me.

Even when PlayStation 3 removed backwards compatibility from the other PlayStation 3 is it wasn't really that relevant to me because I owned a PlayStation 3 with a backwards compatibility but I also owned three other PlayStation 2 because I had a library of close to 80 games....

I'm sorry buddy but if the system is that important to you because of your library why don't you actually have the original in the first place? To my understanding the Xbox one doesn't even play 100% of the 360 games anyway.

I bought a PlayStation 4 to play Playstation 4 games, if it could play previous generations that would simply be a bonus , but it's not going to be the primary reason why I would ever be purchasing a new generation system

If PlayStation 5 has backwards compatibility it would literally do absolutely nothing to me because I actually made it pretty damn clear I have no plans to sell my PlayStation 4.

Like zero.

Even so why would I fill up my PlayStation 5 hard drive with any PlayStation 4 game if I actually own a PlayStation 4? Lol

The way I see it stop crying, stop complaining and simply get a better job because I don't remember it being written anywhere that any of these companies required to give you functionality to previous platforms absolutely for free , it is a nice bonus don't get me wrong , but it's called PlayStation 4 for a reason and not PlayStation (4 3 2 1 Legacy system) lol

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

Completely agreed.

If anyone wants to play the previous library of PlayStation 3 games especially if they own a ridiculous amount it begs the question why they're not actually just purchasing the older PlayStation 3?

Right now they could get one on Amazon for about 100 bucks

I think the PlayStation 3 showed that not as much consumers are actually interested in purchasing a system with a bunch of backwards compatibility if it means paying such a high price and they had to be economical and remove the feature.

At the time the PlayStation 2 had already sold around a hundred and twenty million units to the point where if somebody wants it a PlayStation 2 it's not as if it was impossible to find one.

People need to consider that the PlayStation 4 moving 60 million units with zero backwards compatibility kind of shows that the feature is not as wanted as people would like to exaggerate.

People for the most part are purchasing New Generation platforms for new experiences in the first place.

The people who could afford to purchase New Generation platforms at the launch are likely the same people that already own the previous Platforms in the first place so I never really understand all the bickering and crying over such a thing especially since no one's really forcing anyone to purchase these platforms if they don't have the money to keep their previous

If anything I'd question why on Earth is anyone even worried about purchasing a new generation platform if they can't even afford one without selling their previous.

I still on my PlayStation 3 I have no plans to sell my PlayStation 4 when I buy a PlayStation 5 and if someone is in a situation that's like this I think they need to be more so worried about their current financial situation than a system doubling as four or five other systems lol

Or or... actually consider getting a better job and watching your finances.

I have a hard time understanding all someone cannot afford $100 to play a library of games that they already own.

How would they even be purchasing new games if they can't even afford the previous platform? I'm sorry but it just sounds like a load of BS.

In the next 3 months alone I think I'm dropping enough money on new games to buy like 3 Playstation 3 used.

Put it this way would any of you be willing to spend a hundred extra dollars to have backwards compatibility on a PlayStation 4? Okay now is there a reason why you guys can't actually just simply spend that money on the actual PlayStation 3 itself that exist right now? Lol

As I'm even writing this I'm literally looking at both my PlayStation 4 and Playstation 3........

Even if I purchased an Xbox one I would probably still keep my 360 because to my understanding even the Xbox One does not support 100% of all 360 games...

Sooooo yea.

Stop being poor and crying like a child and just actually keep your old their platforms and get over it.

I'm not really sure how some of you are in a hobby that you know cost money but you want to purchase new platforms when they first release but you can't even afford to do so without selling your previous platform ? which begs the question why are you even purchasing up this time if you can't afford it?

aconnellan2669d ago

So according to your logic, it's all or nothing? We should have enough money to buy as many consoles as we want on a whim or else we shouldn't be buying them at all? Ever heard of a fixed budget?

And further to your point - if you did get an Xbox one and kept your 360 (as you said, 100% aren't BC yet), what would you do if your Xbox one was hooked up and you wanted to play a game that was BC? Would you throw the disc in your One/start it up digitally? Or take the time to unplug everything and set up your 360?

The above example is the entire point of BC - it's just easier. Some people can afford to keep or store their old consoles, some can't. This provides an option for those who otherwise wouldn't have any options

LexHazard792669d ago

Are you writing a novel? Lol...

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

"Or take the time to unplug everything and set up your 360?"

The way my setup is all of my platforms are already actually hooked up through HDMI to my TV it's simply changing an output for me....

I would likely play it on whatever platform I originally had a save file on it largely depends on the game.

"We should have enough money to buy as many consoles as we want on a whim or else we shouldn't be buying them at all?"

Never said that , what I'm saying is if you already own a platform and an entire library of games and the only way you could purchase a new platform is by actually selling your previous one it doesn't actually make any sense if you still intend to play those games......

Because like I said it questions how could you afford to sell the platform to purchase a new platform and then purchase brand new games if you can't even afford to keep the previous?

In my opinion with such a situation financially it would actually make more sense to just wait for price drop or just simply earn more money if the previous platform was truly of value to you.

When PlayStation 5 releases I'm still going to keep my PlayStation 4.

I'm sorry but this just comes down to Common Sense and simple logic your purchasing a device called the PlayStation 4 to play Playstation 4 games never was it stated anywhere that any of these devices automatically by default where did give you the function for free of the previous platform.

That is a nice bonus but if it's missing I'm not entirely sure how you could blame the company or Society or anything like that for your own bizarre financial situation you might need to consider earning more money as I don't see how that's a company's problem before your own.

All of this goes down to personal financial responsibility if you want something actually work hard to get the money to actually buy it but it's not the company's fault that you don't own the previous platform because it was not their job to provide that for you absolutely for free at no cost I believe it is amazing benefit to the consumer that Microsoft gave such a function but that is a bonus that was not some sort of requirement by law.

We have had more platforms that have not had backwards compatibilit then we had platforms that did .

Do you seriously think I care that the switch doesn't support 3DS or Wii U games? Lol

Can you please show me somewhere where this was illegally written in stone that the company had to give you multiple platforms for free?

Did they legally do something wrong? Can you take them to court?

If not it's starting to sound like you don't really have much holding your argument apart other than "please give me something for free without charge" crap

You're basically in tears crying about a system that is over 10 years old that you could purchase for less than $100 right now used , something is definitely wrong with your financial situation if you even feel this is worth crying over.

If you can't afford to buy a new console every six to seven years you might need to reevaluate your financial situation cuz that has very little to do with Sony Nintendo or Microsoft in largely in part has everything to do with your own financial responsibility yourself dear God stop blaming others for your incompetent financial situation...

Rhezin2669d ago

"Stop being poor and get over it." Yeah sure I'll get right on that. You just snap your fingers right? smh....

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

@Rh- ""Stop being poor and get over it." never said that bud.

Simply "Stop being poor and crying like a child and just actually keep your old their platforms and get over it"

That responsibility is up to you, if you have a situation where you can't afford something, you need to think about what you can do to fix that, not Nintendo, Sony or MS.

THAT IS UP TO YOU SOLELY!

If you are poor, that sucks, but don't worry about what is going on with N4G and BC bud, worry about fixing your life up first and foremost. Trust me, this isn't a laughing matter if you are saying you can't afford a less then $100 device, yet want a new gen system. How will you buy games? It just sounds like bad financial judgment to me.

ONESHOTV22668d ago

_-EDMIX-_--- so dude what you are saying is that becuase some on isnt getting much new game they have to play the old ones ? lol what do you say to some that owns 0ver 400 games old and new ? are you going to say yeah you have no games that's why you play the old one lol you fanboys need to come out of the tunnel your field of view is a bit narrow

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2668d ago
Deadpooled2669d ago (Edited 2669d ago )

Good logic there, fully agree there is definitely no real requirement for BC with the sheer number of games from many different genres to suit every type of gamer. Personally I can play PS1/2 games/roms on my crappy i3 laptop whenever I like, and unless Sony put these games on the PS4 store with trophies or any other incentive then I would not be interested.

Drithe2669d ago

This is a Sony news plant to get peeps to buy ps1 games on PSnow. What we really NEVEr needed was PSnow. Having to pay a monthly fee for the right to pay to rent is stupidly greedy. We dont pay Sony a monthly fee for the right to rent movies so why video games?

_-EDMIX-_2669d ago

?

How? Those that want to rent very much could choose to do so that is their option you don't need to use PlayStation Now hack I don't rent my games and I don't use PlayStation now but I also don't think it's some sort of scam because it is up to you.

I don't even understand your last sentence that you don't pay Sony a monthly fee to rent movies well I'm pretty positive you pay Netflix to rent movies you pay lots of services to rent...

This is no different..

YOU never needed PlayStation now that doesn't actually mean people are not using it, I personally don't use it but I'm not going to tell someone else that it shouldn't exist based on my personal preference, that seems pretty stupid and self-centered and it sounds like you're unable to actually understand that other people exist in this market that see that as a viable option to play games.

Shuckylad2669d ago

I've got a great console to play my ps1 classics on.... it's called a Sony PlayStation.

WeAreLegion2669d ago

Or PS2 or PS3. It's crazy that someone wouldn't just get one of those three to play PS1 games.

I-wear-clothes2669d ago

The fact that the ps2, and ps3, can do it but not the ps4 feels like a minor step down to me.

Deadpooled2669d ago

Plus a PS2 with games can be purchased for dirt cheap pre-owned nowadays for anyone wanting to play PS1 games, a PSP can be purchased for dirt cheap and with easily downloadable homebrew can play PS1 games and a myriad of other console games from the past.

Show all comments (78)
60°

Pokemon fans stunned by official shiny hunting guide for Scarlet and Violet

The Pokemon Company has dropped the first-ever official Shiny hunting guide for Pokemon Scarlet and Violet, leaving fans in awe.

Read Full Story >>
mynintendonews.com
460°

IGN Entertainment acquires Eurogamer, GI, VG247, Rock Paper Shotgun and more

IGN Entertainment has acquired the Gamer Network family of digital brands for an undisclosed sum. As a result of the acquisition, some redundancies have been made across the UK-based organisation.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
darthv7211d ago

Well this can only mean one thing... more job layoffs even in the publication industry.

Jin_Sakai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

“Layoffs occuring“

Yep. IGN now has a monopoly in the gaming media.

“As a result of the acquisition, some redundancies have been made across the UK-based organisation.”

“Gamer Network's publications are GamesIndustry.biz, Eurogamer (including six local language editions), Rock Paper Shotgun, VG247 and Dicebreaker. The business also holds shares in Outside Xbox, Digital Foundry and Hookshot (which operates Nintendolife, PushSquare, PureXbox and Time Extension).”

“IGN Entertainment is the division of Ziff Davis that includes IGN, MapGenie, HowLongToBeat, and Humble Bundle. It has acquired the websites from PAX and New York Comic-Con organiser ReedPop, which initially bought the Gamer Network business in 2018.“

Jingsing11d ago

When say IGN you mean Microsoft's chief propagandist.

VenomUK10d ago

Surprising news, also a little sad as the magazine era is over and the website era is slowly coming to an end. But it must be said that many of the bastards who work at these places have operated as a mafia to control opinion on not only what can be said about games, but who can be allowed to talk about them, and what can be allowed to feature in them or not. As said above, redundancies are coming, Eurogamer pays the highest salaries for a team of staff who for some their output is minimal. Eurogamer also campaigned against Hogwarts Legacy and refused to review it -, the site took a hit. PAX has probably thought to cut its losses. Some job layoffs? I know of some of these people and they took pride in excluding - I will shed no tears.

S2Killinit10d ago

This is good news for Microsoft. IGN is like their advertisement arm.

Abear2110d ago

This is exactly what Microsoft needs to better their image, control over the narrative by having the same message come from different colors umbrellas that are all really made by the same company.

Simon_the_sorcerer10d ago

You're right about every single thing that you said...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
-Foxtrot11d ago

All this means is a collective hive mind when reporting the news

They’ll discuss with each other how to handle topics and what kind of headlines to go with so they can fire round after round of whatever point they want to make

And the sad thing is over the many years even to the old GameGate days they love making gamers look bad as a collective. Anything for a hit piece.

victorMaje11d ago

Narrative control. I don’t like this at all.
Independent reviewers will be more important than ever.

JEECE11d ago

"They’ll discuss with each other how to handle topics and what kind of headlines to go with so they can fire round after round of whatever point they want to make."

You say this like it will be a new thing that they didn't already do.

OtterX11d ago

Yea, I had actually just seen today on Linkedin that a GamesIndustry.biz guy was talking about being laid off. I didn't read all of his post, but I bet it's because of this. That's a shame to hear. :\

MestreRothN4G10d ago

All praise the late stage capitalism God, the only real One
\o/

Babadook710d ago

Hopefully the IGNorant journalists get the boot and not EG.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Petebloodyonion11d ago

Probably Microsoft's fault!
They surely gave IGN the idea.
What's next IGN Pass?

But joke aside let's hope that this makes the news better compared to some of IGN branches

Jingsing11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Microsoft and IGN work quite closely so it isn't a stretch to say this is a move to control the gaming press to get everyone singing from the Microsoft hymn sheet. Not a good look at all. It is transparent stuff like this which is backfiring in Microsoft's face. First they want control of all the games now the media.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

While there's obviously a desire to preserve add revenue and early access to review copies, I doubt there's the level of conspiracy here that you imply. I mean there's no direct link between MS and IGN right?

Petebloodyonion11d ago

You're probably right!!!!
Here's MS evil plan
1) Make sure that Hellblade 2 receives inflated reviews.
2) Fire all the ppl across UK who gave Starfield the justified 6/10 reviews
3) Make sure that Game industry.biz stops giving Sony's president a tribute to spew their lies and have them talk to Sarah Bonds and Todd Howard only.
4) Control the majority of players for the GOTY award so MS wins from now on.

PPL needs to know about this!

Jingsing11d ago

@crazyCoconuts The world has moved on from "direct links" as companies were easily caught doing that. These days corporations can merely operate as a cartel through shared mutual interest which is not strictly kosher either but is also more difficult to prove. It's the fundamental flaw with big corporations in the US economy today and no one in power is addressing it.

Lightning7711d ago

Is there proof to anything you're saying?

I've never heard of anything like this or is this N4G once again make believing stuff outta thin air again?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

@jing if you have proof then I stand corrected.
Otherwise it seems like more conspiratorial thinking to explain what could otherwise be explained by natural forces of market economies.
Don't get me wrong, I believe there is bias all over and unsavory influences. I just don't think it's all centrally planned by evil villains in a smoke-filled room

S2Killinit10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I don't think anyone has proof but my personal experience corroborates what he is saying about IGN being in MS’s corner for whatever reason.

Granted, Last time I visited IGN regularly was years ago, I literally stopped once I realized the huge bias they showed in favor of xbox. Their pages for the two consoles were fundamentally different. When they would invite xbox president he was treated completely different than when Shuhei Yoshida was invited. The xbox pres was treated as one of their own. There was just too many examples, it wasn’t even much of a secret.

Jingsing10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

@Lighting77 The proof is in the pudding, "Partnerships for Events: Microsoft and IGN partner for specific events or showcases." "Sponsored Segments: Microsoft has sponsored segments within IGN's showcases." "Industry Relationships: Microsoft and IGN, as major players in the gaming industry, simply have good working relationships. This leads to collaborations on shows & joint announcements without any ownership involved." They just had an event together recently. The crux of it is money is being exchanged for favors, when that happens editorial independence goes out the window.

There was controversy about Microsoft having involvement with Polygon in the past and it proved to be real and effected their editorial bias. "Investment in Web3 Startup: Microsoft's venture capital arm, M12, participated in a $20 million funding round for Space and Time, a Web3 data warehousing platform, alongside Polygon (amongst other investors) "

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
shinoff218311d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I mean news did come out the same day hellblade did.

Jk

Petebloodyonion10d ago

The embargo was to make sure IGN had time to finalize the deal and make sure Eurogamer gave this game a 5 stars instead of a 3.

Man, how devious and low can Microsoft go just to promote Gamepass
I heard that it costs a ton of money to MS and they will raise the price of Gamepass by a lot of money just to compensate
true story

Christopher11d ago

Oh boy! If we've learned one thing about recent news, corporate shrinkage of an industry via buyouts from those at top only leads to good things for employees and consumers!

Aloymetal11d ago

100%!!
IGN and Eurogamer...A match made in heaven!!

thesoftware73011d ago

Aloy!
Yes, good credible websites, I agree, it is a good match.

IGN is one of the most trusted gaming sites, weather you like it or not, but I know because they don't fit the N4G goofiness bubble, they can't be good.

shinoff218311d ago

I left ign years ago. Used to be on the ign forums all the time. I left there and found here. Not sure if you remember but this place used to be pretty bad for Sony fans. 360 was king for a few years. Anyone I don't quite remember but ign changed. Whatever the fk it was it seemed for the worse.

VenomUK10d ago

You’re right Christopher, just look at how N4G has improved since the buyout. .

Huey_My_D_Long10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I think the consolidation is an issue. the whole conspiracy angle n4g guys are playing at by saying MS gave IGN money for this is annoying, but overall the Consolidation is not a good move.

Christopher10d ago

I'm not on the bribing for reviews thing. Scores themselves should be ignored entirely as far as I'm concerned. But, consolidation is not helping anyone but to solidify IGN even more than ever before. Less competition at the top.

Lexreborn211d ago

Ummmm not sure that’s a good thing that all these review sites are under the same umbrella. There’s no guarantee that they will maintain a non-bias opinion not paid for by the highest bidder.

MrNinosan11d ago

They haven't been non-bias since GamePass was crowned "best service in gaming".

Amplitude11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You can go much farther back than that. Never forget the Kane and Lynch 2 review drama

Edit: wait that was GameSpot. Still though - don't trust these websites for anything. Find YouTubers like who's opinions you agree with and watch them instead. GaminylGames, Minimme, Digital Foundry, GMan, whatever. All better than these ad-filled "reviews" from people who are forced to play games and score with an arbitrary number

MrNinosan11d ago

@Amplitude
Digital Foundry has lost my trust ever since they got that MS money, but other than that, I'm with you.

If I'm on the fence of a game, I wait till the reviewers that share my taste has given their opinion.

Cockney10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

@MrNinosan
I didn't blame Microsoft for inviting digital foundry to expressly launch their new hardware, I mean good move by them getting a non bias technology focused influencer to gush about the series x, my issue is they took them up on their offer, taking a blatant sweetener like that really irks me, ever since I view their content with a pinch of salt

Charal11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Ouch, that does not sounds good for Eurogamer.
With so much of the industry media that will more or less follow the same editorial line, it will be harder and harder to distinguish PR from actual journalism in a couple of years.

Thinking about it, may it explain their review score for Hellblade 2?

Christopher11d ago

***harder and harder to distinguish PR from actual journalism in a couple of years. ***

The age of gaming advertorials.

Petebloodyonion11d ago

You're right all of this is just to promote Hellblade 2 and inflate the score.
Also the why cuts are indeed coming to Eurogamer and other UK branches because they only gave Starfield an average score.

Jingsing11d ago

Shed the non US assets that are not favorable to Xbox keep the US assets that are. Microsoft are going to deliver crap and they are going to tell you their crap is good and you are going to buy it. That seems to be the strategy. At this point I just want them out of gaming as they are operating like cancer.

VenomUK10d ago

YouTubers ursurped the games media years ago.

victorMaje11d ago

Exactly right. No more journalists. Just 1 take regurgitated & paraphrased down the chain. Smh.

Abear2110d ago

Their marketing budget is nonexistent. Instead they will publish articles for you to click on this site to get information (biased propaganda) about their games and ad dollars from you here and on their website too.

This is the new marketing strategy

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
Show all comments (89)
110°

Two JRPGs inspired by the classics are doing great on Kickstarter right now

Runa and Alzara's crowdfunding campaigns are booming

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
shinoff218313d ago

Even though I think runa looks great I'm more inclined to back the second Kickstart they show. One because they are actually doing a console version. Two because they have physical pledge.

gold_drake11d ago

god. this gamesradar is riddled with ads and popups