320°

Xbox One Used Games Policy Possibly Explained Through Reddit

VGR: Theataraxian posted a visual aid to how he believes the Xbox One used game policy will work. It seems logical and if true would screw Gamestop in the process, so I don’t see an issue. I just hope that Sony reveals more information soon, because if they aren’t careful they will receive a wave of backlash by angry internet nerds for no reason as well.

Read Full Story >>
vgrevolution.com
boybato4028d ago (Edited 4028d ago )

Jesus why use names such as Snoo and Soon when you could just use Bob and Joe. lol

Edit: As if Xbox Done hasn't make it more complicated.

Muerte24944028d ago

agreeing or disagreeing with you. If the used policy works as it's described in the article, then this isn't all that bad. It's a bit complicated but, apparently, you can let your friend can borrow your copy. What will happen is they then remove the game from your account and then associate with your friends account. The same game cannot be played at the same time on two different (main)accounts.

I can see two things happening with this

*A* Gamestop will definitely have to give you more for your trade-ins to prevent you from selling it to another bidder

*B* Getting your account hacked will have hasher ramifications. They can sell your game code and remove it from your game library. Forcing you to repurchase a game you already bought.

jc485734028d ago (Edited 4028d ago )

not bad for those that buy them new only. It makes it even more complicated because the games are directly linked to your account now, so what happens when they decide to take the service down? Will I have a functioning console to play my hard bought games? I mean, this is the online only thing that people are concerned about. What's the point of buying xbozone realizing something is dead wrong?

Soldierone4028d ago

Still begs the question.

What if we have a family, some people do this so bare with me, and more than one person in this family wants to play the same game. So these people both have accounts on the same Xbox in the same house, what happens then? Does person one need to "deactivate" and person two "activates" just to play the game?

I don't have an issue with not playing at the same time. That makes sense, you can't do that now, so who cares. However this system is in place to block something, and I want to know what it is. Can a game only be activated so many times? If not, then how is it restricting Gamestop at all?

4028d ago
denawayne4028d ago

@soldierone - MS already said that every profile on the system the game is installed can play the game.

xxV0rschlaghammer4028d ago

I think Gamestop and MAJOR retailers that sell used games now will most likely have a system in place whereby they place the game you trade-in to them into a machine that connects to MS's servers and deactivates the game from all accounts. Makes sense to me, if you think about it Gamestop was investing a bunch of money in trading DLC and digital content which this makes sense as it's basically one in the same with this.

The other thing thats far-fetched but I'd like to believe would be that maybe, just maybe DLC will be linked to the game discs as well as accounts, so say someone trades a game in with a season pass or some sort of DLC downloaded for it that it will transfer with the game thus maybe increasing trade values/etc, but thats just a pipe dream most likely.

I think MS will get a cut of every used game sale though, especially if they go with the route I think they will with some sort of way to deactivate the game in store. Whether it'll be enough to affect trade-in values and used prices remains to be seen.

theBAWSE4028d ago

Complete and utter bullshit senior MD's have already stated if someone wants to play the game on THEIR account they gotta pay the fee of the game which conveniently goes to ms. If the average Joe can understand why can't these supposed journalists

Soldierone4028d ago

@denaywayne

Okay, now what about families with multiple Xbox's in the house? You know, two brothers. Parents and kids, separate rooms etc....

Darrius Cole4028d ago (Edited 4028d ago )

@Muerte2494

I don't think that the policy works as described in the article. Once the second user installs the game then the system prompts him to pay a fee, which is the cost of the full price of the game.

If it worked as it is described in the article then the internet wouldn't be going ape-$#!+.

P.S.

Microsoft is going to be vague on the issue until AFTER E3 because they don't want the gamers to know. They want their faithful Xbox live subscribers to fall into the trap. So they are not going to give any clarity by E3 because the media machine would broadcast it to the heavens and ruin their strategy.

BlindGuardian4027d ago

that's wrong, in particular the part when it says that the game is removed from the first account when oit's installed on a second

THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS

the games will be installed on both consoles but only playable from one profile, when the games returns to the original owner it will still be installed, and the friend won't be able to play it unless he buys it from the online store

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4027d ago
indysurfn4028d ago

I think the simular names for confusion was on purpose. Okay I will now be a Sony fanboy! The fact that Microsoft HAS a used game policy is restrictive. Right now I have FULL freedom. So am I to wait and see if they are giving me MORE then full freedom, even though they are NOT announcing it yet? NO! OBVIOUSLY they are going to bend us ALL over and are hoping Sony is in on it! Plus if you require me to be online to watch tv BLANK YOU! That add another and WORSE restriction then I was already dreadding. I was worrying about used games, and being required to be online to play a game. Now on TOP of that I cant even watch tv if I'm not online? HELLO! HELLO! BLANK MICROSOFT and any cable/satellite carrier that supports them! TALK ABOUT GETTING BUNDLED! Now even your games will be bundle except it will be a REQUIRED BUNDLE! Thang they DO bundle everything! Forget those $200 cable bills its 450$ now! And oh yeah why would I want to be forced to go to a store(that they approve to boot). How about I can sell my game to a buddy instead of getting ripped off by a store. Or give it to a nephew? They are not READY to give details? It is already restrictive!

showtimefolks4028d ago

It seems logical and if true would screw Gamestop in the process, so I don’t see an issue.

you don't see the issue ok here i will explain since you seem quite a dumb ass

Unless Valve is running steam on these consoles i don't trust any of them with digital entertainment, when you leave it up to console makers they will charge you whatever they want.

you walk into a bestbuy or gamestop trade in your game and buy a brand new game, that won't be allowed

its not screwing gamestop its screwing the gamers, right now my copy of uncharted can be played by any of my friends and if a company wants to block that than i won't support them, i hope/pray MS goes through with this because they will be out of gaming business in a very short time.

this is signing your own death wish

fermcr4027d ago (Edited 4027d ago )

Don't like the names they used (Snoo and Soon), but actually... that image is starting to shed some light on the used games market scheme.

You have a game and lend it to a friend, he installs it and has 2 options:

- buys the game for his account and plays.

- or doesn't buy the game and installs and plays it (witch will remove the game from your library). When he returns the game, you can re-add it to your account.

To summarize, both of you can't play the same copy of the game at the same time, unless one of you buys another copy.

PSVita4027d ago (Edited 4027d ago )

This can't be how it works because if you sold your game to GameStop you'd still have it on your HDD until someone bought it and installed it to there system. Plus publisher still aren't getting money.... Right?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4027d ago
1OddWorld4028d ago

This isn't correct. There is no image of the publisher of the game getting money when you give your old game to a friend who didn't actually pay to play their game.

EVERYONE MUST PAY TO PLAY!!!

Not an issue for me I play demo on Gaikai and if I like the game I either download it direct, or go buy a new physical copy. I keep my games and I never share because I hate people.

BISHOP-BRASIL4028d ago

"[...] because I hate people."

You must be such a delight to be around. ¬¬'

Darrius Cole4028d ago

Ah yes, but he doesn't have to share his games because he owns them.

See what rights you get from owning something.

r214028d ago

Sooo owners who bought used games have to still pay to play the said game? Wonderful, offline passes.

xPhearR3dx4027d ago

If these images are correct, then no, you're wrong. We can install games to the 360 now, but it requires the disc. Where on Xbox One, you install the game and don't need the disc. So to prevent people from buying and sharing one game. That specific copy can only be activated on one account. So if you let your friend borrow the game, you still have it installed on your Xbox, but you can't play until you have the disc again.

BUT, you can get the disc back from your friend, and instead of he/she running out to the store and purchasing it, he/she can pay a "fee" to unlock the game to be used on their account. Therefor no need to install or need a disc, it's already there for you to use.

Now. If what I typed above is 100% accurate. This is a VERY good thing and convient for people who don't care to own physical copies of games. Which means MS VERY poorly explained it.

However, if what I said isn't correct and that "fee" is to allow you to play used games instead of deactivating it on someone else's account. That's pure BS.

r214027d ago

So still offline passes then? You cant access the disc's content until you either pay the fee(offline pass) or use your buddy's account which you activated the disc. So what way was i wrong?

xPhearR3dx4027d ago (Edited 4027d ago )

No you're not understanding. If your friend has the disc, the game activates on THEIR profile and deactivated on YOUR profile. Meaning, your friend can play the game all he wants just like you can now if you let your friend borrow a 360 game. BUT if you get your game back, and put it in your Xbox, it reactivates on YOUR profile and deactivates on HIS profile.

So if your friend wants to continue playing the game, you'll need to give him the disc again, or he can pay a "fee" to unlock it and own it without the need to go to the store or download anything.

Foxhound9224028d ago

Sounds like a complicated mess to me

torchic4027d ago

I highly doubt it's as complicated as it seems right now.

a lot of what we're hearing about how this will operate is based on many different vague statements from Microsoft people being fused together.

Microsoft know what the whole process is, they definitely know what's up, they just won't tell us.

I personally don't think it works the way it does in the pic. from what I've been reading and hearing, your friend who has just borrowed a copy of Battlefield 4 from you has the ability to take the disc and install it on his X1, but then would be prompted to pay a fee to actually start the game (activation).

once you buy your own copy of Battlefield 4, it is 100% linked to your account and whoever wants to play it on their account would have to pay.

I don't mind used game blocks, but what I do mind is the fact that you can't borrow/lend games with friends.

bratman4027d ago

"I don't mind used game blocks, but what I do mind is the fact that you can't borrow/lend games with friends."

that's the same thing :/

You lending/borrowing a game that has already been played by you or someone else is a Used game.

swishersweets200314028d ago

the picture is wrong, in order to loan your friend a game and not have them pay the full retail fee, you have to give your friend your game sign in and password and let him log in as you. At the same time you go home and cant log into your xbox under your account..

you can spin this anyway you want the facts are clear they are going to rape your wallet :p

boybato4028d ago

bu bu but account sharing is against Lives TOS. lol

denawayne4028d ago

Not true at all. One activated license on one account at a time. I play a game, finish it, give it to you, you download it and activate to your account, it deletes from my account. That way it can't be passed to 500 people and they all can play at same time unless they purchase a license.

1OddWorld4027d ago

If you purchased the game new your wallet isn't being raped. If you are getting the game from a friend and then having to pay a fee to play it on your console then you are still not being raped. Paying to play a game that you want to play is just fair. Getting your wallet raped is when they sell you DLC that should have been in the game in the first place, or make you pay to play online.

Show all comments (54)
150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies7d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX7d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody7d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

rob-GP3d ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic "They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo..."

lol, you mean:

NES, SNES
GameBoy, GameBoy Advanced, GameBoy Colour, GameBoy SP
DS, DSi, DSXL
3DS, 3DS XL, New 3DS, New 3DS XL
Wii, Wii U
Switch, Switch OLED

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Cacabunga7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_7d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga7d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie5d ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly7d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga7d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit7d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_7d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21837d ago (Edited 7d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies7d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (31)
150°

Microsoft to Add Copilot AI to Video Games

Microsoft recently revealed its plans to incorporate Copilot directly into video games, with Minecraft being the first showcased example.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Fishy Fingers12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

F*** AI

"Hey Copilot, what's a good meme to prove I dislike AI".... https://giphy.com/clips/sou...

Einhander197212d ago

Two trillion dollar company that just can't wait to put as many people possible out of work as fast as possible.

It feels like every single thing they do is making gaming worse and destroying the industry.

12d ago
12d ago
12d ago
darthv7211d ago

....you know it takes people to program the AI.... right? It isnt like it is sentient. We haven't reach skynet level of situation or anywhere close to the matrix just yet.

That's next Thursday.

Einhander197210d ago (Edited 10d ago )

It takes a people to program the AI then that AI is used for who knows how many games eliminating countless jobs which only grows as AI is used for more and more game creation functions.

What you're saying is so ridiculously short sighted and truly larking any kind of understanding and foresight.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
CaptainFaisal11d ago

Why all the hate? Im actually excited about this! Always wanted this kind of immersion, and an AI companion with me all the time helping me out knowing the status of my skills/inventory/progress and giving me tips on the best approach or how to craft something specific is game changing for the industry.

Hate all you want about AI, but this is just the start and I can see the potential already. You wont be complaining in the next 5-10 years about this, but rather complain if a game hasn’t implemented it.

MrDead11d ago

Yes we can't wait for the work of others to be used without the need to pay them so that MS can profit even more from the people they fire.

I_am_Batman11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

There is no chance I'd ever use something like this, especially if it's not part of the core game design, but a layer on top of it. It's way too much handholding. Many games already feel like busy work, because they don't let the player figure things out on their own. Having a real-time interactive guide defeats the purpose of playing the game in the first place in my opinion.

If this were to become the standard like you predict, we'll see more and more video games get away with bad design, because people will just be used to ask for help from the AI companion anyway.

Number1TailzFan11d ago

Well Nintendo don't need this with some of their games these days, with invincible characters, items, easy bosses etc.. they do the hand holding built in

helicoptergirl11d ago

Takes "hand holding" in games to a whole new level.

BlackDoomAx10d ago

Because human nature xD Almost every new technology had these kind of comments.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
Show all comments (19)
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Psychonaut8515d ago

They’re not working on Call of Duty? Give it time.